-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[core-api][experimental] observable_source_asset, multi_observable_source_asset #26706
base: 12-23-_core-apis_experimental_definitions.get_all_asset_specs_definitions.with_reconstruction_metadata
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
991c6c0
to
73e3a15
Compare
72bc4c7
to
11433a6
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i know this has existed for years, but given this feels inconsistent with the rest of surface areas, i wonder if we could boldly mark this as Preview?
opinion not strongly held. open to push back.
Agree with yuhan. We need to replace source asset with external asset language and this is an oversight, so Beta doesn't really communicate this accurately. |
73e3a15
to
9712a54
Compare
11433a6
to
0ba9041
Compare
9712a54
to
b1446c6
Compare
0ba9041
to
6af0044
Compare
b1446c6
to
2487afe
Compare
6af0044
to
d182b8f
Compare
Summary & Motivation
decision: experimental -> beta
reason: we have aspirations of simplifying the ways in which we define asset observation computations, let's leave the option value open to change names on these APIs
docs exist: n/a
How I Tested These Changes
Changelog