Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[core-api][experimental] AssetOut tags #26689

Conversation

OwenKephart
Copy link
Contributor

Summary & Motivation

decision: experimental -> GA
reason: we like having tags on our objects, this is no exception, I see no reason why we would ever change this behavior
docs exist: yes (api only, which is ok)

How I Tested These Changes

Changelog

Insert changelog entry or delete this section.

Copy link
Contributor

@yuhan yuhan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

approving for the decision, but don't forget to add docstring.

@OwenKephart OwenKephart force-pushed the 12-23-_core-api_experimental_direct_resource_passing branch from 6b3e956 to 19f02c5 Compare December 31, 2024 18:47
@OwenKephart OwenKephart mentioned this pull request Dec 31, 2024
@OwenKephart OwenKephart force-pushed the 12-23-_core-api_experimental_assetout_tags branch from fa417d5 to fe82fe7 Compare December 31, 2024 18:47
@OwenKephart OwenKephart marked this pull request as ready for review December 31, 2024 18:51
@OwenKephart OwenKephart force-pushed the 12-23-_core-api_experimental_assetout_tags branch from fe82fe7 to 19880aa Compare December 31, 2024 19:18
@OwenKephart OwenKephart changed the base branch from 12-23-_core-api_experimental_direct_resource_passing to 12-23-_core-api_experimental_owners_ December 31, 2024 19:18
## Summary & Motivation

decision: experimental -> public
reason: we are using this pattern heavily internally, and generally have
built up a lot of APIs around making this sort of thing work. we want
people to be using this pattern in other places (e.g. multi_asset), so
it shouldn't be marked as experimental
docs exist: yes (api only, which is ok)

## How I Tested These Changes

## Changelog

> Insert changelog entry or delete this section.
@OwenKephart OwenKephart merged commit a8eba8c into 12-23-_core-api_experimental_owners_ Dec 31, 2024
1 check was pending
@OwenKephart OwenKephart deleted the 12-23-_core-api_experimental_assetout_tags branch December 31, 2024 19:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants