Skip to content

Added utility belt function to scrap armor #39233

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 27, 2025
Merged

Added utility belt function to scrap armor #39233

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 27, 2025

Conversation

@ToastEnjoyer
Copy link
Contributor

@ToastEnjoyer ToastEnjoyer commented Jul 27, 2025 •
edited
Loading

About the PR

Scrap armor now has a built in utility belt

Why / Balance

Idea originated from Djmc216 on the #ideaguys channel, and was thumbsed up by emisse, it makes sense for this because you actually need a toolbelt in the crafting of the scrap armor,

Technical details

Added the belt parent to the scrap armor, no you cannot put the armor in the belt slot.

Media

image_2025-07-26_201956328

Requirements

Breaking changes

Changelog
🆑 Toast_Enjoyer, Djmc216

  • add: The scrap armor now functions as a utility belt too!

@PJBot PJBot added S: Needs Review Status: Requires additional reviews before being fully accepted. Not to be replaced by S: Approved. S: Untriaged Status: Indicates an item has not been triaged and doesn't have appropriate labels. Changes: No C# Changes: Requires no C# knowledge to review or fix this item. labels Jul 27, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines. label Jul 27, 2025
@PJBot PJBot added S: Approved Status: Reviewed and approved by at least one maintainer; a PR may require another approval. and removed S: Needs Review Status: Requires additional reviews before being fully accepted. Not to be replaced by S: Approved. labels Jul 27, 2025
beck-thompson
beck-thompson approved these changes Jul 27, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@beck-thompson beck-thompson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

cool idea!

@beck-thompson beck-thompson added P3: Standard Priority: Default priority for repository items. T: New Feature Type: New feature or content, or extending existing content DB: Beginner Friendly Difficulty: Great for beginners. Unambiguous in scope, and explains how to achieve the result. A: General Interactions Area: General in-game interactions that don't relate to another area. and removed S: Untriaged Status: Indicates an item has not been triaged and doesn't have appropriate labels. labels Jul 27, 2025
@beck-thompson beck-thompson merged commit 7852b52 into space-wizards:master Jul 27, 2025
12 checks passed
@ToastEnjoyer ToastEnjoyer deleted the patch-5 branch August 2, 2025 16:44
VasilisThePikachu added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 3, 2025
@VasilisThePikachu
Revert "Added utility belt function to scrap armor (#39233)"
978c51e 
This reverts commit 7852b52.

Revert suggested due to the utility toolbelt may be considered too overpowered and passed

<https://youtu.be/8RmeZKz-i_w?t=2548>

@ToastEnjoyer
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@Emisse Emisse Emisse approved these changes

@beck-thompson beck-thompson beck-thompson approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

A: General Interactions Area: General in-game interactions that don't relate to another area. Changes: No C# Changes: Requires no C# knowledge to review or fix this item. DB: Beginner Friendly Difficulty: Great for beginners. Unambiguous in scope, and explains how to achieve the result. P3: Standard Priority: Default priority for repository items. S: Approved Status: Reviewed and approved by at least one maintainer; a PR may require another approval. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines. T: New Feature Type: New feature or content, or extending existing content

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@ToastEnjoyer @Emisse @beck-thompson @PJBot