-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 967
WIP: [NEVER MERGE] test gha-tools rapids-get-pr-artifact changes #19593
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Auto-sync is disabled for draft pull requests in this repository. Workflows must be run manually. Contributors can view more details about this message here. |
/ok to test |
/ok to test |
/ok to test |
/ok to test |
Copying the format from #18747 (comment) With the proposed patterns here + in the linked PRs above, it should be possible to get 100% confidence that the PR CI artifacts will be used for:
Conda tests can sometimes fall back to nightlies, because we're not yet using strict channel priority in conda test jobs. Doing that in the future would be helpful: rapidsai/build-planning#14 (comment) Looking to see ✅ `conda-cpp-build` (using CI artifacts)
✅ `conda-python-build` (using CI artifacts)
|
This testing is complete, closing this. |
Description
Ignore this... testing these changes:
Together with this
rmm
PR:Checklist