-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add generate docs test #338
Conversation
Warning Rate limit exceeded@satoren has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 2 minutes and 8 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (4)
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces a new step in the GitHub Actions workflow for the project. Specifically, a "generate docs" step has been added to the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/test.yml (1)
69-70
: Enhance the documentation generation step.While adding documentation generation is valuable, consider these improvements:
- Verify the documentation is generated successfully
- Cache the documentation artifacts
- Consider publishing the documentation for pull requests
Here's a suggested enhancement:
- name: generate docs - run: mix docs + run: | + # Ensure ex_doc is available + mix deps.get + # Generate docs + mix docs || exit 1 + # Verify docs were generated + test -d doc || exit 1 + - name: Cache documentation + uses: actions/cache@v4 + with: + path: doc + key: ${{ runner.os }}-docs-${{ github.sha }} + - name: Upload documentation artifact + uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4 + with: + name: documentation + path: doc/
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/test.yml
(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Build and test (stable)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/test.yml (1)
69-70
: Verify ex_doc dependency is properly declared.The
mix docs
command requires theex_doc
package. Let's ensure it's properly declared in the project.✅ Verification successful
ex_doc dependency is properly configured ✅
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if ex_doc is declared in mix.exs rg -A 5 "ex_doc" mix.exs # Check if ex_doc is listed in mix.lock rg "ex_doc" mix.lockLength of output: 760
88ed519
to
27604ab
Compare
5fc08b4
to
25ce77c
Compare
25ce77c
to
4db883b
Compare
Summary by CodeRabbit