Organization Repositories Page Beta Feedback

[pablonete]

We're excited to announce that the new organization repositories page is in Beta 🥳

Find it under orgs/org-name/repositories or by clicking the Repositories tab in your organization.

It comes with a sidebar and a suggestions engine to help writing your search query.

Let us know what you think by reacting here or posting your feedback below. Thank you!

[mchittineni]

the old view was much better than this

[turiot]

Yes, the lack of language filtering is disappointing.

[ansh-devs]

❤️ sure

[NipunBinjola]

The language filter is still there, when you click in the search bar it shows a list of applicable filters

[patapata24]

sure

[hey2022]

Is there a way to sort repositories by stars?

[Anony568]

Best

[savvin-dev]

In the previous version, the distance between elements gave enough information in one point where the eyes were looking. Now it has become "painful" to look at the list, it is impossible to focus in one point because of too many elements in one place.

UPD: Also, it looks very bright on the dark theme, all trying to get in my eyes.

[GavynHolt]

Font is suddenly way to small.

[msangals]

You can choose between two design options, I think this is a good compromise for people who like smaller fonts.

[Sheunzy]

Yes...i think this should be re adjust

[nadirsidi]

I would like to see the repo names in bold

[swang81]

Great learning resources, albeit with occasional minor bugs. I'll assist in identifying and addressing these issues to continually enhance its quality.

[Aerowiel]

Sorry but I don't like the new design at all, its waaaaaaaaaaaay too small

[zhaojc]

agree

[Atugatran]

Old is Better

[Tourch-tech]

I think so too

[ksbde]

Have we got an option to return on old design?

[MathiasAugustesen]

I have low zoom in general, but the repositories are too small. More than 60% of it is blank space. Search functionality is very good :)

[Mansourbeik]

Yes

[Miladkarimi9977]

اره

[ad-si]

In the left sidebar there is tons of whitespace while quite a lot of the description in the repo list is cut off.

[darlanalves]

If you squeeze the width a liiitle bit more, the whole sidebar turns into a dropdown.

[chrispat]

We made some adjustments to the default width and adjusted the point where the sidebar turns into a dropdown so it happens sooner and the description does not squeeze the description so much.

[J0SH1X]

the old view looked much nicer

[dhikshith12]

i hate this

[maneetgoyal]

Don't like it.

[githubofkrishnadhas]

The new appearence of UI in beta phase is nice feature. but at the same time it is occupying a lot of space unnecessarly. 🚀probably you can make it to a collapsible and expandable mode.

• The new section can be made as a collapsible/expandable window as necessary will be better in my opinion.cc @pablonete

[ianwilliams1]

I kind of like this idea, except for the fact the collapsing sidebar implementation on the github docs site seems completely botched up for me.

[rcj0003]

Not a fan of this update.

• The Private label for repositories is essentially invisible in comparison to the bright white font of the repository name
• I recall the graph of contribution activities on the right-hand side being larger and clickable
• Generally speaking, it's difficult to read the info in comparison to the previous design

[venkatamutyala]

For open-source organizations managing hundreds of repositories, a useful addition would be the ability to save and share searches as a "saved view" in the left panel. This would allow anyone visiting the organization's page to access these shared views.

[j-fulbright]

I like it! More modern and useful.

[beauty342]

Swears

[Ken199211]

grrat

[MaxusTheOne]

Is adding an organization to an existing repository not supposed to be a feature?

[flutterdevsgou]

We're excited to announce that the new organization repositories page is in Beta 🥳

Find it under orgs/org-name/repositories or by clicking the Repositories tab in your organization.

It comes with a sidebar and a suggestions engine to help writing your search query.

Let us know what you think by reacting here or posting your feedback below. Thank you!

We're excited to announce that the new organization repositories page is in Beta 🥳

Find it under orgs/org-name/repositories or by clicking the Repositories tab in your organization.

It comes with a sidebar and a suggestions engine to help writing your search query.

Let us know what you think by reacting here or posting your feedback below.

Thank you!

[angeliresha]

Great

[davidscheidtbitstop]

I like it. One suggestion, can you add the ability to select page size?

[nikitaourazbaev]

I like the redesign overall. Still seeing some vertical layout shift in the list of repositories after the page loads. Not as bad as in the previous design but it’s still happening.

[ossanna16]

Hi @10008st , thanks for participating!

We take our Code of Conduct very seriously and want to help ensure that everyone has a good experience free of antagonism and harassment. Unfortunately, we don’t currently have moderators for languages other than English. Until that changes, we need to ask that everyone use English here in the GitHub Community when posting.

[dave-i-beck]

Sorting the repo list by last pushed doesn't work anymore. The list comes up in random order.

[GlebIrovich]

Hey! Thanks for sharing. Could you provide us more information.
What is the org?
Do you observe randomness in "Updated ..." order?

[dave-i-beck]

Exactly. I noticed that it seems ok looking at the whole org but when I add filter to a specific project prefix the randomization is more noticeable.

[janbrasna]

Bug: Fixed.

@GlebIrovich @pablonete Scary bug: Icons for repo type (in condensed list) show PUBLIC instead of PRIVATE (or ARCHIVED per se) for Private Archived repos:

(for a second I thought someone changed their visibility to public!)

[janbrasna]

Both "box" icon for archived or "locked" for private would be OK, even better if you can make a "box" with "lock" to distinguish it perfectly, that'd be nice touch.

But just please don't use "public" icon for a repo that was never public in the first place.

[StaticPH]

Frankly, I would be quite happy to have fewer icons and more labels site-wide, but icons are trendy. So obviously, everything needs to have icons, even if they don't clearly relate to whatever label they supplement or replace. 🤷‍♂️

[GlebIrovich]

Thanks for reporting 👻

Perhaps we ran out of icons 😉
I will bring it up with the team

[GlebIrovich]

This must be fixed now 😇

[janbrasna]

Yup I can confirm the release next day (along with the Archived repos not included in All view) the Public × Private visibility got fixed. Thanks!

Also checked other repo types like templates, forks etc. and there's no confusion now.

@StaticPH The icons are only used in the condensed view, otherwise the typical pill with text is normally used so that you can do without icons representing the meaning. OTOH the text/pills has other issues though, like when used in a org home sidebar the (Private archive) changes only to (Private) if there's not enough space etc., so I'd rather have an icon given the space constraints, than truncated text not showing the exact repo state TBH.