Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Force include locations #64

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

corneliusroemer
Copy link
Member

Description of proposed changes

Current include/exclude settings don't allow for countries to be force included.

This PR adds that ability in a symmetrical way to exclude.

Because we of course don't want to force include countries that have very little data, a force include is ignored if it satisfies the normal include by <10%.

I guess instead of having a simple force include, one could have a dict that allows certain countries to have a laxer include requirement: e.g. Brazil could be included if it has at least 40% of the required sequences of non-force included countries.

I played a bit with settings and these seem quite reasonable to me. Notably, we should extend the window within which min-seqs are counted as many very important countries (India, South Africa, Brazil) produce sequences with a significant delay. That doesn't make them unuseful for the analysis, I don't think we should be as strict as we currently are.

Here's how the new settings would look:
image

Relax the location_min_seq_days as many important countries have quite some delay
but are still informative/important
@corneliusroemer
Copy link
Member Author

Can you look at this @trvrb, @joverlee521, @jameshadfield? It would be nice to have some important countries force included. Current country selection has nothing from South America nor from Africa.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant