Fix ROR(x, 32) on arm64 #102291
Merged
Fix ROR(x, 32) on arm64 #102291
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
dotnet-issue-labeler
bot
added
the
area-CodeGen-coreclr
|
Tagging subscribers to this area: @JulieLeeMSFT, @jakobbotsch |
|
/azp run runtime-coreclr jitstress-random |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
|
PTAL @dotnet/jit-contrib trivial fix |
jakobbotsch
approved these changes
May 15, 2024
jakobbotsch
reviewed
May 15, 2024
tannergooding
approved these changes
May 16, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #102285
Minimal repro:
the previous logic folded
GT_ROR(x, 32)toGT_ROR(x, 0)because it tookparentNode(which is(int)GT_EQ) into account to calculate max rotation width.