Skip to content

Actions: dotnet/runtime

Actions

All workflows

Actions

Loading...
Loading

Showing runs from all workflows
2,500+ workflow runs
2,500+ workflow runs

Filter by Workflow

⌥ + click/return to exclude

Filter by Event

⌥ + click/return to exclude

Filter by Status

⌥ + click/return to exclude

Filter by Branch

⌥ + click/return to exclude

Filter by Actor

⌥ + click/return to exclude
Running Copilot Code Review Copilot #1973: by Copilot AI
Queued fix/jit-cross-target-handle-bits
fix/jit-cross-target-handle-bits
Queued
Preserve JIT handle bits in cross-target builds Format jit codebase #11455: Pull request #129034 opened by MichalStrehovsky
In progress fix/jit-cross-target-handle-bits
fix/jit-cross-target-handle-bits
In progress
Code Review Code Review #10022: Pull request #129034 opened by MichalStrehovsky
In progress fix/jit-cross-target-handle-bits
fix/jit-cross-target-handle-bits
In progress
Preserve JIT handle bits in cross-target builds check-no-merge-label #78319: Pull request #129034 opened by MichalStrehovsky
7s
7s
Preserve JIT handle bits in cross-target builds Labeler: Predict (Pulls) #13657: Pull request #129034 opened by MichalStrehovsky
In progress
In progress
Breaking Change Documentation Breaking Change Documentation #2970: Pull request #128709 closed by BrzVlad
2s
2s
Running Copilot Code Review Copilot #1972: by Copilot AI
In progress main
main
In progress
Code Review Code Review #10021: Pull request #126220 synchronize by rosebyte
2s rosebyte:experiment/tracing-configuration
rosebyte:experiment/tracing-configuration
2s
[wip][nomerge] Add Tracing Configuration Markdownlint #13374: Pull request #126220 synchronize by rosebyte
44s rosebyte:experiment/tracing-configuration
rosebyte:experiment/tracing-configuration
44s
[wip][nomerge] Add Tracing Configuration check-no-merge-label #78318: Pull request #126220 synchronize by rosebyte
5s
5s
Running Copilot Code Review Copilot #1971: by Copilot AI
6m 37s copilot/ilverify-false-positive-fix
copilot/ilverify-false-positive-fix
6m 37s
Code Review Code Review #10020: Pull request #129032 synchronize by jkotas
18s copilot/ilverify-false-positive-fix
copilot/ilverify-false-positive-fix
18s
Fix ILVerify false positive: ReturnPtrToStack on by-value return of a ref struct check-no-merge-label #78317: Pull request #129032 synchronize by jkotas
6s
6s
Running Copilot Code Review Copilot #1970: by Copilot AI
6m 0s main
main
6m 0s
Remove GetCommandLineW from PAL Backport PR to branch #473125: Issue comment #125386 (comment) created by jkotas
1s
1s
Code Review Code Review #10019: Pull request #125386 synchronize by jkotas
2s huoyaoyuan:pal/commandline
huoyaoyuan:pal/commandline
2s
Remove GetCommandLineW from PAL check-no-merge-label #78316: Pull request #125386 synchronize by jkotas
5s
5s
Code Review Code Review #10018: Pull request #125386 synchronize by jkotas
3s huoyaoyuan:pal/commandline
huoyaoyuan:pal/commandline
3s
Remove GetCommandLineW from PAL check-no-merge-label #78315: Pull request #125386 synchronize by jkotas
5s
5s
Fix ILVerify false positive: ReturnPtrToStack on by-value return of a ref struct check-no-merge-label #78314: Pull request #129032 edited by Copilot AI
Action required
Action required
Fix ILVerify false positive: ReturnPtrToStack on by-value return of a ref struct Backport PR to branch #473124: Issue comment #129032 (comment) created by Copilot AI
Action required
Action required
Fix ILVerify false positive: ReturnPtrToStack on by-value return of a ref struct Code Review #10017: Pull request #129032 synchronize by Copilot AI
Action required copilot/ilverify-false-positive-fix
copilot/ilverify-false-positive-fix
Action required
Fix ILVerify false positive: ReturnPtrToStack on by-value return of a ref struct check-no-merge-label #78313: Pull request #129032 synchronize by Copilot AI
Action required
Action required
Never attempt to process an RSA 16K key on Android Backport PR to branch #473123: Issue comment #129033 (comment) created by azure-pipelines Bot
1s
1s
Never attempt to process an RSA 16K key on Android Backport PR to branch #473122: Issue comment #129033 (comment) created by vcsjones
1s
1s