SecAuditLogParts: add tests for the expected behavior

[tty2]

This PR fixes the behavior for SecAuditLogParts that was not correct according to research. Look here
Additionally it separates the auditlog and errorlog logic, before it was tightly coupled and this test failed on nolog,auditlog couple together, which is not supposed according to the doc.

• My code includes positive and negative tests.
• I have an appropriate description with correct grammar.
• I have read Contribution guidelines, maintainers note and Quality standard.
• My code is properly linted and passes pre-commit tests.

[jcchavezs]

@tty2 could you please enable actions in your fork?

[tty2]

@jcchavezs Unfortunately actions for my account are disabled. I made a request for github support, but they answer not quick (probably during a month as I can see from threads)

[tty2]

@jcchavezs I saw codecov complained about less coverage than before.
Actually I added for the cases were didn't cover before.
If go the way to make codecov happier there is only I can do is adding formal tests, that make no real profit.
WDYT? Should I add formal tests?