Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: add security notice 14 #5149

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

markfarkas-camunda
Copy link
Contributor

@markfarkas-camunda markfarkas-camunda commented Mar 5, 2025

Description

We had a critical vulnerability in Web Modeler. Jira ticket: https://jira.camunda.com/browse/SEC-1285

When should this change go live?

  • This is a bug fix, security concern, or something that needs urgent release support. (add bug or support label)
  • This is already available but undocumented and should be released within a week. (add available & undocumented label)
  • This is on a specific schedule and the assignee will coordinate a release with the DevEx team. (create draft PR and/or add hold label)
  • This is part of a scheduled alpha or minor. (add alpha or minor label)
  • There is no urgency with this change (add low prio label)

PR Checklist

  • My changes are for an upcoming minor release and:
    • are in the /docs directory (version 8.8).
    • are in the /versioned_docs/version-8.7/ directory (version 8.7).
  • My changes are for an already released minor and are in a /versioned_docs directory.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 5, 2025

👋 🤖 🤔 Hello, @markfarkas-camunda! Did you make your changes in all the right places?

These files were changed only in docs/. You might want to duplicate these changes in versioned_docs/version-8.6/.

  • docs/reference/notices.md
These files were changed only in docs/. You might want to duplicate these changes in versioned_docs/version-8.7/.
  • docs/reference/notices.md

You may have done this intentionally, but we wanted to point it out in case you didn't. You can read more about the versioning within our docs in our documentation guidelines.

@wollefitz wollefitz added the component:web-modeler-sm Issues related with Web Modeler Self-Managed label Mar 5, 2025
Copy link
Member

@wollefitz wollefitz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for adding the notice! Additionally to the individual remarks, this has to be backported to all previous doc versions.

@wollefitz wollefitz added the kind/bug Issues related with bugs in the documentation label Mar 5, 2025
@wollefitz wollefitz requested a review from a team March 5, 2025 19:05
@markfarkas-camunda
Copy link
Contributor Author

@camunda/tech-writers in this PR we cannot link the docker images for specific versions (which contains the fix) because Web Modeler does not distribute images prior to 8.6 publicly, only on registry.camunda.cloud. In this case what should be the desired format of this security notice?

@akeller
Copy link
Member

akeller commented Mar 6, 2025

@camunda/tech-writers in this PR we cannot link the docker images for specific versions (which contains the fix) because Web Modeler does not distribute images prior to 8.6 publicly, only on registry.camunda.cloud. In this case what should be the desired format of this security notice?

My understanding based on the Slack thread is this will go out next week with the official release. Would it be ready then? If so, we can just keep this in a PR and you can add the link when it's ready.

@markfarkas-camunda
Copy link
Contributor Author

Would it be ready then?

@akeller If you are referring to the docker images, those won't be available, Web Modeler just simply does not offer public Docker images, so we cannot link to previous versions, and we won't be able to in the future either. The question is: can we just skip the linking in this case? (mentioning the versions with the fix but only as plain text and not as links)

this will go out next week with the official release

That is my understanding as well.

Copy link
Member

@wollefitz wollefitz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the adjustments - looks good now!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
component:web-modeler-sm Issues related with Web Modeler Self-Managed kind/bug Issues related with bugs in the documentation
Projects
Status: 👀 In Review
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants