Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Resolve all eslint warnings #48197

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 24, 2025
Merged

Conversation

bbovenzi
Copy link
Contributor

@bbovenzi bbovenzi commented Mar 24, 2025

I saw we added a lot of ignore statements in #48123. We can just use JSON.stringify and then I fixed the other outstanding warnings when you run pnpm lint:fix


^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named {pr_number}.significant.rst or {issue_number}.significant.rst, in newsfragments.

@boring-cyborg boring-cyborg bot added the area:UI Related to UI/UX. For Frontend Developers. label Mar 24, 2025
@kaxil kaxil merged commit d4ab484 into apache:main Mar 24, 2025
35 checks passed
@kaxil kaxil deleted the fix-eslint-warnings branch March 24, 2025 19:25
@jscheffl
Copy link
Contributor

Cool. Some learning received :-D Thanks for cleaning behind me.

got686-yandex pushed a commit to got686-yandex/airflow that referenced this pull request Mar 24, 2025
prabhusneha pushed a commit to astronomer/airflow that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2025
pankajkoti pushed a commit to astronomer/airflow that referenced this pull request Mar 28, 2025
shubham-pyc pushed a commit to shubham-pyc/airflow that referenced this pull request Apr 2, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area:UI Related to UI/UX. For Frontend Developers.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants