Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: Clarify that the motion functions use script functions for execution #255

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 30, 2025

Conversation

urfeex
Copy link
Member

@urfeex urfeex commented Jan 29, 2025

Make it explicit that there is no magic going on here, but the motion functions simply forward information to respective URScript functions using the same parametrization and implications as the script functions.

…ution

Make it explicit that there is no magic going on here, but the motion
functions simply forward information to respective URScript functions
using the same parametrization and implications as the script functions.
@urfeex urfeex added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Jan 29, 2025
@urfeex urfeex requested a review from a team January 29, 2025 15:24
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 29, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 73.20%. Comparing base (2c12bee) to head (cf27e3c).
Report is 14 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #255      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   71.71%   73.20%   +1.49%     
==========================================
  Files          71       75       +4     
  Lines        2786     2889     +103     
  Branches      353      360       +7     
==========================================
+ Hits         1998     2115     +117     
+ Misses        596      587       -9     
+ Partials      192      187       -5     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

doc/architecture/instruction_executor.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
doc/architecture/trajectory_point_interface.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Rune Søe-Knudsen <[email protected]>
@urfeex urfeex requested a review from urrsk January 30, 2025 07:24
@urfeex urfeex merged commit 25d81bf into UniversalRobots:master Jan 30, 2025
23 checks passed
@urfeex urfeex deleted the update_traj_interface_docs branch January 30, 2025 09:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants