fixes: long-title/consistent sideber ui

[Rukhsarkh]

Issue Number:

Fixes #2902

Snapshots/Videos:

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
no

Have you read the contributing guide?
yes

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Style
  • Refined menu styling with smaller font sizes and improved hover effects
  • Enhanced responsiveness for sidebar and feature card layouts
  • Updated class definitions to improve visual consistency

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@Rukh-khan has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 8 minutes and 54 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 836c461 and a8acb14.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• docs/src/css/custom.css (1 hunks)

Walkthrough

The pull request focuses on modifying the docs/src/css/custom.css file to enhance the styling and responsiveness of the documentation site. The changes primarily involve adjusting font sizes, padding, and introducing new class definitions for menu-related elements. The modifications aim to improve the visual layout and ensure better readability across different screen sizes by refining CSS rules and adding hover effects.

Changes

File	Change Summary
docs/src/css/custom.css	- Modified .menu * class with reduced font size and increased font weight - Added hover effect for .menu__link - Replaced .menu__list ul with .menu__list-item - Introduced new class definitions for menu and sidebar elements - Updated media queries for improved responsiveness

Assessment against linked issues

Objective	Addressed	Explanation
Break Word Property [#2902]	❓	CSS changes do not explicitly implement word-break property for markdown content

Possibly related PRs

• Added corrections #2895: Modifies the same CSS file and introduces a new class .image-container

Suggested labels

ignore-sensitive-files-pr

Suggested reviewers

• palisadoes

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[github-actions]

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
   1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
   1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
   2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
   3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

1. comments in this PR or
2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 39.85%. Comparing base (836c461) to head (a8acb14).
Report is 1 commits behind head on develop-postgres.

Additional details and impacted files

@@                Coverage Diff                @@
##           develop-postgres    #2916   +/-   ##
=================================================
  Coverage             39.85%   39.85%           
=================================================
  Files                   453      453           
  Lines                 33203    33203           
  Branches                385      385           
=================================================
  Hits                  13234    13234           
  Misses                19969    19969           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 4

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 836c461 and a8acb14.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• docs/src/css/custom.css (1 hunks)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)

• GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (typescript)

🔇 Additional comments (2)

docs/src/css/custom.css (2)

131-133: LGTM! Good use of CSS custom property.

The hover effect using var(--primary-blue-600) maintains consistency with the theme system.

---

124-127: Consider accessibility implications of small font size.

The font size of 0.65rem (≈10.4px) might be too small for comfortable reading. The WCAG guidelines recommend a minimum text size of 12px for body text.

Consider increasing the font size:

- font-size: 0.65rem;
+ font-size: 0.75rem;

[Rukhsarkh]

@coderabbitai full review

[coderabbitai]

✅ Actions performed

Full review triggered.