Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature/ux improvements - This PR updates a line from PR #3091 causing wrong brand color. Apologies for the oversight! #3092

Merged

Conversation

Abhi-MS
Copy link

@Abhi-MS Abhi-MS commented Jan 28, 2025

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

.navbar__brand colour was changed. Fixing this issue

Issue Number:

Fixes #2951

Snapshots/Videos:

Before,
image

After,
image

If relevant, did you update the documentation?

Not relevant

Summary

Brand colour was changed as suggested by coderabitai which led to unwanted changes.

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

No.

Checklist

CodeRabbit AI Review

  • I have reviewed and addressed all critical issues flagged by CodeRabbit AI
  • I have implemented or provided justification for each non-critical suggestion
  • I have documented my reasoning in the PR comments where CodeRabbit AI suggestions were not implemented

Test Coverage

  • I have written tests for all new changes/features
  • I have verified that test coverage meets or exceeds 95%
  • I have run the test suite locally and all tests pass

Other information

Have you read the contributing guide?

Yes

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Style
    • Added CSS variables for GitHub, Twitter, and YouTube icon dimensions
    • Updated .HeaderHero class to use responsive height with clamp()
    • Modified external link SVG positioning in navbar for improved layout

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 28, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request focuses on updating the docs/src/css/custom.css file with improvements to CSS styling and responsiveness. The changes include introducing new CSS variables for icon dimensions (GitHub, Twitter, YouTube), modifying the .HeaderHero class to use a responsive height with the clamp() function, and adjusting the positioning of external link SVGs in the navbar. These modifications aim to enhance the maintainability and flexibility of the documentation website's styling.

Changes

File Change Summary
docs/src/css/custom.css - Added CSS variables for icon dimensions (--icon-github-width/height, --icon-twitter-width/height, --icon-youtube-width/height)
- Updated .HeaderHero class to use clamp() for responsive height
- Modified header link icon styles to use new variables
- Adjusted external link SVG positioning

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Update navbar styling [#2951]
Ensure consistent navbar across documentation sites [#2951] Styling changes made, but full consistency requires verification
Minimal homepage design CSS changes support potential design updates, but full implementation not clear

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • palisadoes

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d232016 and 4418760.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/src/css/custom.css (5 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
docs/src/css/custom.css (2)
Learnt from: Abhi-MS
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3092
File: docs/src/css/custom.css:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-01-28T06:14:47.383Z
Learning: When hiding elements that should remain accessible to screen readers in Talawa's documentation, use the clip-pattern (position: absolute, width/height: 0, clip/clip-path) instead of display: none.
Learnt from: Abhi-MS
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3092
File: docs/src/css/custom.css:656-683
Timestamp: 2025-01-28T06:09:27.385Z
Learning: Media query consolidation in docs/src/css/custom.css should preserve both min-width and max-width constraints to properly handle narrow and wide screen edge cases. The file uses specific ranges (e.g. 1001px-1049px) to target precise screen sizes.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: Run tests for talawa api
  • GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
docs/src/css/custom.css (4)

71-76: LGTM! Well-structured CSS variables for icon dimensions.

The addition of CSS variables for icon dimensions improves maintainability and follows the existing naming conventions.


290-291: LGTM! Consistent use of CSS variables for icon dimensions.

The icon dimensions now use the CSS variables defined in :root, making the code more maintainable while preserving the existing functionality.

Also applies to: 301-302, 312-313


652-652: LGTM! Elegant use of clamp() for responsive height.

The HeaderHero height now uses clamp() to achieve the same responsive behavior more elegantly.


658-666: LGTM! Accessibility-friendly approach to hiding SVGs.

The implementation uses the clip-pattern technique to hide external link SVGs while keeping them in the accessibility tree, which is better than using display: none.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 28, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 39.85%. Comparing base (332a957) to head (4418760).
Report is 1 commits behind head on develop-postgres.

Additional details and impacted files
@@                Coverage Diff                @@
##           develop-postgres    #3092   +/-   ##
=================================================
  Coverage             39.85%   39.85%           
=================================================
  Files                   453      453           
  Lines                 33203    33203           
  Branches                385      385           
=================================================
  Hits                  13234    13234           
  Misses                19969    19969           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@palisadoes palisadoes added the ignore-sensitive-files-pr The contributor has a legitimate reason for editiing protected files label Jan 28, 2025
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 5

🔭 Outside diff range comments (2)
docs/src/css/index.css (1)

Fix variable name mismatch and remove unrelated changes

The implementation has two issues:

  • The defined variable --brand is never used, while the code references a non-existent --brand-color
  • The PR includes many unrelated color and UI variables that should be part of a separate change
🔗 Analysis chain

Line range hint 8-25: Review brand color implementation.

The brand color is now properly defined as a root variable:

--brand: #febc59;

However, this PR includes many additional color and UI variables beyond the scope of the brand color fix.

Please confirm if these additional variable definitions are necessary for the brand color fix.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Error: No shell scripts found


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for usage of the brand color variable
rg --type css "var\(--brand\)" -B 2 -A 2

# Search for any potential color calculations or modifications involving brand color
rg --type css "color:.*--brand|background.*--brand|border.*--brand" -B 2 -A 2

# Look for any CSS files that might contain related styling
fd -e css -x cat {} \; | rg "febc59" -B 2 -A 2

Length of output: 436

docs/src/css/custom.css (1)

Line range hint 599-611: Use CSS custom properties for button gradients.

The gradient values are duplicated across multiple button styles. Consider using CSS custom properties for better maintainability.

+ :root {
+   --button-gradient: linear-gradient(90deg, #ff3600 0%, #ff8100 100%);
+   --button-gradient-hover: linear-gradient(90deg, #ff3600 30%, #ff8100 78%);
+ }

  .markdown > button {
-   background: linear-gradient(90deg, #ff3600 0%, #ff8100 100%);
+   background: var(--button-gradient);
    /* ... */
  }

  .markdown > button:hover {
-   background: linear-gradient(90deg, #ff3600 30%, #ff8100 78%);
+   background: var(--button-gradient-hover);
  }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 332a957 and b3db4f2.

📒 Files selected for processing (26)
  • docs/docusaurus.config.ts (2 hunks)
  • docs/src/components/HomepageFeatures/index.tsx (0 hunks)
  • docs/src/components/HomepageFeatures/styles.module.css (0 hunks)
  • docs/src/components/animations/_dissectionAnimation.js (0 hunks)
  • docs/src/components/animations/_headerAnimation.js (0 hunks)
  • docs/src/components/layout/EightPanel.tsx (0 hunks)
  • docs/src/components/layout/FifthPanel.tsx (0 hunks)
  • docs/src/components/layout/FourthPanel.tsx (0 hunks)
  • docs/src/components/layout/HeaderHero.tsx (1 hunks)
  • docs/src/components/layout/SecondPanel.tsx (0 hunks)
  • docs/src/components/layout/SeventhPanel.tsx (0 hunks)
  • docs/src/components/layout/SixthPanel.tsx (0 hunks)
  • docs/src/components/layout/ThirdPanel.tsx (0 hunks)
  • docs/src/css/custom.css (10 hunks)
  • docs/src/css/index.css (7 hunks)
  • docs/src/hooks/useHomePageAnimations.ts (0 hunks)
  • docs/src/pages/index.tsx (1 hunks)
  • docs/src/pages/markdown-page.md (0 hunks)
  • docs/src/utils/AppFeaturesCard.tsx (0 hunks)
  • docs/src/utils/HomeCallToAction.tsx (1 hunks)
  • docs/src/utils/ManagementFeaturesCard.tsx (0 hunks)
  • docs/src/utils/OrganizationFeatureCard.tsx (0 hunks)
  • docs/src/utils/ParticipationFeatureCard.tsx (0 hunks)
  • docs/src/utils/TextColumn.tsx (0 hunks)
  • docs/src/utils/TwoColumns.tsx (0 hunks)
  • docs/src/utils/textcontent.js (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (20)
  • docs/src/pages/markdown-page.md
  • docs/src/components/layout/SecondPanel.tsx
  • docs/src/components/layout/FifthPanel.tsx
  • docs/src/utils/TextColumn.tsx
  • docs/src/utils/AppFeaturesCard.tsx
  • docs/src/utils/OrganizationFeatureCard.tsx
  • docs/src/components/HomepageFeatures/styles.module.css
  • docs/src/components/layout/EightPanel.tsx
  • docs/src/components/layout/FourthPanel.tsx
  • docs/src/utils/TwoColumns.tsx
  • docs/src/utils/ParticipationFeatureCard.tsx
  • docs/src/components/layout/SeventhPanel.tsx
  • docs/src/components/layout/ThirdPanel.tsx
  • docs/src/components/HomepageFeatures/index.tsx
  • docs/src/components/layout/SixthPanel.tsx
  • docs/src/utils/ManagementFeaturesCard.tsx
  • docs/src/hooks/useHomePageAnimations.ts
  • docs/src/components/animations/_headerAnimation.js
  • docs/src/utils/textcontent.js
  • docs/src/components/animations/_dissectionAnimation.js
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: Run tests for talawa api
  • GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (9)
docs/src/components/layout/HeaderHero.tsx (2)

9-13: Changes appear more extensive than described in PR objectives.

The PR description mentions fixing a brand color issue, but these changes involve significant restructuring of the HeaderHero component, including:

  • Removal of two-column layout
  • Removal of image elements
  • Updates to text content

Please clarify if these additional changes are intentional and related to the brand color fix.


14-16: LGTM: Button implementation looks good.

The HomeCallToAction button implementation is clean and properly structured.

docs/src/pages/index.tsx (1)

Line range hint 7-21: Verify intentional removal of homepage components.

The changes include removal of multiple panel components and animations. This seems to be a significant departure from the stated PR objective of fixing a brand color issue.

Please confirm if removing these components is intentional:

  • SecondPanel through EighthPanel components
  • Homepage animations
  • Associated imports
docs/src/utils/HomeCallToAction.tsx (1)

19-19: LGTM: Improved GitHub link specificity.

Good improvement to make the GitHub link point directly to the talawa-api repository instead of the organization.

docs/src/css/index.css (1)

159-192: Verify necessity of media query changes.

The PR includes extensive responsive design changes that appear unrelated to the brand color fix:

  • New breakpoints at 760px, 480px, and 960px
  • Layout adjustments for different screen sizes

Please clarify if these responsive design changes are necessary for the brand color fix.

docs/src/css/custom.css (1)

73-73: LGTM: Dark theme configuration looks good.

The dark theme variables are well-structured and maintain proper contrast ratios for accessibility.

docs/docusaurus.config.ts (3)

87-88: LGTM! Navigation configuration follows Docusaurus best practices.

The change from href to to with activeBasePath is the correct approach for internal navigation in Docusaurus. This ensures proper active link highlighting and client-side routing.


165-165: LGTM! Copyright notice updated correctly.

The copyright notice has been appropriately updated to reflect The Palisadoes Foundation, LLC.


Line range hint 1-174: Verify the brand color changes mentioned in PR objectives.

The PR objectives mention fixing a brand color issue and updating .navbar__brand color, but no color-related changes are visible in this file. The color changes might be in CSS files that weren't included in this review.

Let's verify the color changes:

docs/src/css/index.css Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/src/css/custom.css Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/src/css/custom.css Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/src/css/custom.css Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/src/css/custom.css Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@palisadoes
Copy link
Contributor

Please make coderabbit approve your work

Copy link

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

@palisadoes
Copy link
Contributor

Please make code rabbit approve your PR

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Jan 28, 2025
Copy link

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 26c1eba and d232016.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/src/css/custom.css (10 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
docs/src/css/custom.css (2)
Learnt from: Abhi-MS
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3092
File: docs/src/css/custom.css:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-01-28T06:14:47.383Z
Learning: When hiding elements that should remain accessible to screen readers in Talawa's documentation, use the clip-pattern (position: absolute, width/height: 0, clip/clip-path) instead of display: none.
Learnt from: Abhi-MS
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3092
File: docs/src/css/custom.css:656-683
Timestamp: 2025-01-28T06:09:27.385Z
Learning: Media query consolidation in docs/src/css/custom.css should preserve both min-width and max-width constraints to properly handle narrow and wide screen edge cases. The file uses specific ranges (e.g. 1001px-1049px) to target precise screen sizes.
🔇 Additional comments (6)
docs/src/css/custom.css (6)

71-76: LGTM! Icon dimensions are now properly managed using CSS variables.

The implementation follows the suggested improvements from previous reviews, making icon dimensions more maintainable.


289-315: LGTM! Icon dimensions now use the CSS variables.

The icon dimensions are now properly referenced using the CSS variables, improving maintainability.


651-652: LGTM! HeaderHero height is now responsive using clamp.

The implementation follows the suggested improvements from previous reviews, using CSS clamp for fluid responsive heights.


656-666: LGTM! Accessibility-friendly approach to hiding SVG icons.

The implementation follows the clip-pattern for hiding elements while keeping them accessible to screen readers, as discussed in previous reviews.


Line range hint 669-773: LGTM! Media queries maintain precise screen size control.

The implementation preserves both min-width and max-width constraints as required, ensuring proper handling of narrow and wide screen edge cases.


Line range hint 46-46: LGTM! Brand color is now correctly implemented.

The brand color is properly defined for both light and dark themes, addressing the issue mentioned in the PR objectives.

Also applies to: 91-91

docs/src/css/custom.css Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Jan 28, 2025
@palisadoes
Copy link
Contributor

  1. Please fix the merge conflicts
  2. Make code rabbit approve your changes

Copy link

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

@Abhi-MS
Copy link
Author

Abhi-MS commented Jan 28, 2025

  1. Please fix the merge conflicts
  2. Make code rabbit approve your changes

Its good now.

@palisadoes palisadoes merged commit 7d4f843 into PalisadoesFoundation:develop-postgres Jan 28, 2025
18 checks passed
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Jan 28, 2025
6 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ignore-sensitive-files-pr The contributor has a legitimate reason for editiing protected files
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants