Skip to content

Conversation

@TaduJR
Copy link
Contributor

@TaduJR TaduJR commented Nov 14, 2025

Explanation of Change

This PR fixes split or incomplete translations in reportActionsView.beginningOfChatHistory by migrating from string concatenation to a parameterized translation approach with HTML rendering.

Problem:
The current implementation uses an incomplete translation string "This chat is with " (with trailing space) and manually assembles the UI by mapping over participants to create individual UserDetailsTooltip components.
This violates translation best practices because:

  1. The translation is split into parts (phrase + names)
  2. Grammar rules (commas, "and") are hardcoded in components instead of translations
  3. Different languages have different grammar rules that can't be expressed

Solution:
Following the established pattern from MentionUserRenderer

Fixed Issues

$ #72050
PROPOSAL: #72050 (comment)

Tests

Test Case 1: One Participant Chat

  1. Open a group chat with exactly 1 participant
  2. Scroll to the beginning of chat history
  3. Verify the welcome message shows: "This chat is with [Name1]."
  4. Hover over each name and verify tooltips appear (In Desktop Versions)
  5. Click each name and verify navigation to respective profiles

Test Case 2: Two Participant Chat

  1. Open a group chat with exactly 2 other participants
  2. Scroll to the beginning of chat history
  3. Verify the welcome message shows: "This chat is with [Name1] and [Name2]."
  4. Verify no comma before "and" for 2 participants
  5. Hover over each name and verify tooltips appear (In Desktop Versions)
  6. Click each name and verify navigation to respective profiles

Test Case 3: Three+ Participant Chat (Group Chat)

  1. Open a group chat with 3+ participants
  2. Scroll to the beginning of chat history
  3. Verify the welcome message shows: "This chat is with [Name1], [Name2], and [Name3]."
  4. Verify commas appear after each name except the last
  5. Verify "and" appears before the final name
  6. Hover over each name and verify tooltips appear (In Desktop Versions)
  7. Click each name and verify navigation to respective profiles

Test Case 4: Optimistic Accounts (Unregistered Users)

  1. Send a money request to an unregistered email/phone number
  2. Open the resulting chat
  3. Scroll to the beginning of chat history
  4. Verify the welcome message displays the unregistered contact's display name
  5. Verify the name is bold, and clickable
  6. Verify hovering shows the tooltip but clicking does nothing

Test Case 5: Concierge & Self-DM

  1. Open Concierge chat
  2. Verify the appropriate welcome message (not affected by this PR)
  3. Open self-DM chat
  4. Verify the appropriate welcome message (not affected by this PR)
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

QA Steps

// TODO: These must be filled out, or the issue title must include "[No QA]."
Same as tests

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android-Native.mp4
Android: mWeb Chrome
Android-mWeb.mp4
iOS: Native
iOS-Native.mp4
iOS: mWeb Safari
iOS-Safari.mp4
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Mac-Chrome-1.mp4
MacOS: Desktop
Mac-Desktop.1.mp4

@TaduJR TaduJR requested review from a team as code owners November 14, 2025 08:59
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Nov 14, 2025

Hey, I noticed you changed src/languages/en.ts in a PR from a fork. For security reasons, translations are not generated automatically for PRs from forks.

If you want to automatically generate translations for other locales, an Expensify employee will have to:

  1. Look at the code and make sure there are no malicious changes.
  2. Run the Generate static translations GitHub workflow. If you have write access and the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

Alternatively, if you are an external contributor, you can run the translation script locally with your own OpenAI API key. To learn more, try running:

npx ts-node ./scripts/generateTranslations.ts --help

Typically, you'd want to translate only what you changed by running npx ts-node ./scripts/generateTranslations.ts --compare-ref main

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed request for a team and JmillsExpensify November 14, 2025 08:59
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Nov 14, 2025

@situchan Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 14, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ Changes either increased or maintained existing code coverage, great job!

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...ents/HTMLEngineProvider/BaseHTMLEngineProvider.tsx 88.67% <100.00%> (+0.21%) ⬆️
...mponents/HTMLEngineProvider/HTMLRenderers/index.ts 100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/components/ReportWelcomeText.tsx 88.13% <100.00%> (+2.02%) ⬆️
src/libs/SidebarUtils.ts 81.83% <95.00%> (+0.84%) ⬆️
...gineProvider/HTMLRenderers/UserDetailsRenderer.tsx 77.77% <77.77%> (ø)
... and 196 files with indirect coverage changes

@TaduJR TaduJR force-pushed the fix-Translation-Migration-Fix-split-or-incomplete-translations-in-reportActionsView branch from aa3534e to 685df71 Compare November 14, 2025 09:58
@situchan
Copy link
Contributor

situchan commented Nov 15, 2025

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: HybridApp
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: HybridApp
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: HybridApp
android.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: HybridApp
ios.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
msafari.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
web.mov

Copy link
Contributor

@situchan situchan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@TaduJR Screenshots are missing on all platforms

…t-or-incomplete-translations-in-reportActionsView
@TaduJR TaduJR requested a review from situchan November 18, 2025 08:24
…t-or-incomplete-translations-in-reportActionsView
…t-or-incomplete-translations-in-reportActionsView
…t-or-incomplete-translations-in-reportActionsView
@TaduJR TaduJR closed this Nov 20, 2025
@TaduJR TaduJR deleted the fix-Translation-Migration-Fix-split-or-incomplete-translations-in-reportActionsView branch November 20, 2025 06:34
@TaduJR TaduJR restored the fix-Translation-Migration-Fix-split-or-incomplete-translations-in-reportActionsView branch November 20, 2025 06:34
…t-or-incomplete-translations-in-reportActionsView
@TaduJR TaduJR reopened this Nov 20, 2025
TaduJR and others added 3 commits November 22, 2025 00:35
…tion-Migration-Fix-split-or-incomplete-translations-in-reportActionsView
…t-or-incomplete-translations-in-reportActionsView
…lations-in-reportActionsView' of https://github.com/TaduJR/App into fix-Translation-Migration-Fix-split-or-incomplete-translations-in-reportActionsView
@TaduJR
Copy link
Contributor Author

TaduJR commented Nov 22, 2025

@TaduJR Screenshots are missing on all platforms

All Done @situchan

TaduJR and others added 3 commits November 24, 2025 18:33
…tion-Migration-Fix-split-or-incomplete-translations-in-reportActionsView
…t-or-incomplete-translations-in-reportActionsView
…t-or-incomplete-translations-in-reportActionsView
Copy link
Contributor

@situchan situchan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

getWelcomeMessage function is also used to show alternative text in LHN.
There's regression.

Expected:
Image

Actual:

Image

@TaduJR
Copy link
Contributor Author

TaduJR commented Nov 29, 2025

Oh Thanks @situchan

Done.
Screenshot 2025-11-29 at 12 31 09 in the afternoon

@TaduJR TaduJR requested a review from situchan November 29, 2025 09:34
}

welcomeMessage.messageHtml = messageHtml;
welcomeMessage.messageText = Parser.htmlToText(welcomeMessage.messageHtml);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How can we make sure that messageText is exactly the same as before migration?

welcomeMessage.messageText = displayNamesWithTooltips.length ? ensureSingleSpacing(`${welcomeMessage.phrase1} ${displayNamesWithTooltipsText}`) : '';

ensureSingleSpacing is no longer needed?

Can we add some unit tests to confirm no regression in messageText?

There should be no difference between Parser.htmlToText(welcomeMessage.messageHtml) and

displayNamesWithTooltips.length ? ensureSingleSpacing(`${welcomeMessage.phrase1} ${displayNamesWithTooltipsText}`) : ''

@situchan
Copy link
Contributor

Test Case 4: 5. Verify the name is bold but NOT clickable

I think test step is wrong. It's clickable

Screen.Recording.2025-11-30.at.11.58.35.PM.mov

@TaduJR
Copy link
Contributor Author

TaduJR commented Dec 1, 2025

Can we add some unit tests to confirm no regression in messageText?

Done.

@situchan
Copy link
Contributor

situchan commented Dec 1, 2025

Job 8 is failing but I think it's expected as it's now 12/25.
We should fix this in a separate issue, not related to this PR.

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from roryabraham December 1, 2025 02:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants