Skip to content

Refactor - No address versions #51

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

DaMatrix
Copy link

@DaMatrix DaMatrix commented Aug 2, 2024

Description

This PR depends on #50 (script-bytes-not-strings).

Much of the existing code contains multiple variants for three different kinds of address: default, "temp" and "v0". Both "temp" and "v0" are not used, and have been marked for removal for well over a year.

This PR completely removes them, and all code referencing address versions, so that all addresses are assumed to be of the "default" type.

Changelog

  • Removed functions and opcodes related to the two deprecated address versions
  • Removed address version parameter from all applicable functions and structs
  • Simplified tests which were duplicated for each of the three address versions into a single one

Type of Change

Please mark the appropriate option by putting an "x" inside the brackets:

  • Bug fix
  • New feature
  • Enhancement or optimization
  • Documentation update
  • Other (please specify)

Checklist

Put an "x" in the boxes that apply. If you're unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help!

  • I have tested the changes locally and they work as expected.
  • I have added necessary documentation or updated existing documentation.
  • My code follows the project's coding standards and style guidelines.
  • I have added/updated relevant tests to ensure the changes are properly covered.
  • I have checked for and resolved any merge conflicts.
  • My commits have clear and descriptive messages.

Screenshots (if applicable)

If the changes affect the UI or have visual effects, please provide screenshots or GIFs showcasing the changes.

Additional Context (if applicable)

Add any additional context or information about the changes that may be helpful in understanding the pull request.

Related Issues (if applicable)

If this pull request is related to any existing issues, please list them here.

Requested Reviewers

Mention any specific individuals or teams you would like to request a review from.

@DaMatrix DaMatrix requested a review from a team as a code owner August 2, 2024 13:08
…ess-version

# Conflicts:
#	src/utils/transaction_utils.rs
Copy link
Contributor

@BHouwens BHouwens left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approved. Will mark official once the previous release is tested and working

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants