Skip to content

checking ci issue #160

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

checking ci issue #160

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

prnvkv
Copy link
Contributor

@prnvkv prnvkv commented May 2, 2025

No description provided.

Signed-off-by: pranav-zededa <[email protected]>
Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hello @prnvkv, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

Summary of Changes

This pull request is aimed at addressing a CI issue that causes the TestProfileDeployment_Create test to fail in the CI environment while passing locally. To temporarily resolve this, the author has commented out the code that skips the test when running in the CI environment. This allows the test to run and pass in CI, while the underlying issue is investigated.

Highlights

  • CI Issue: Commenting out the code that skips the TestProfileDeployment_Create test in the CI environment.
  • Temporary Fix: This change is intended as a temporary workaround to allow the test to pass in CI while the root cause of the failure is investigated.

Changelog

  • v2/resources/profile_deployment_service_resource_test.go
    • Commented out os import.
    • Commented out the conditional statement that skips the test in the CI environment.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.


A test in CI,
Fails, though locally it flies.
A comment's soft sleep,
While secrets it keep,
Till the root cause we descry.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

The pull request addresses an issue where tests were failing in the CI environment but passing locally. The changes involve commenting out the code that skips the test in the CI environment. This allows the tests to run in CI, which is necessary for ensuring the reliability of the code. However, the root cause of the test failures in CI should be investigated and resolved.

Summary of Findings

  • Investigation of CI failures: The code temporarily disables the skip for CI, but the underlying issue causing the test failures in CI should be investigated and resolved to ensure the tests pass consistently in all environments.

Merge Readiness

The pull request makes the tests run in CI, which is a positive step. However, the root cause of the test failures in CI should be investigated and resolved. I would recommend addressing this before merging. I am unable to directly approve the pull request, and users should have others review and approve this code before merging.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant