Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updates for week of March 4 #79

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 7, 2024
Merged

Updates for week of March 4 #79

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 7, 2024

Conversation

duglin
Copy link
Contributor

@duglin duglin commented Mar 1, 2024

  • "latest" on a request that would result in "no latest version" is an error
  • clarify that attributes with default values don't require their owning
    Objects to be present
  • be consistent about case after dashes (e.g. -word vs - Word)
  • treat hasDocument resources like Groups. Use of ?meta is meaningless, every
    MUST always be in the HTTP body. No xRegistry HTTP headers
  • DELETE will NOT return the deleted resources, use "204"
  • "contenttype" is ok to use with RESOURCEurl. No guarantee it matches the
    Content-Type of a the GET to RESOURCEurl though
  • URI Template type : per RFC6570 section 3.2.1 (level 1)

@duglin duglin force-pushed the Mar4 branch 5 times, most recently from 9e0c2b3 to 1046700 Compare March 5, 2024 21:12
- add some clarifications around the use of `latest` attribute
- clarify that attributes with default values don't require their owning
  Objects to be present
- be consistent about case after dashes (e.g. -word vs - Word)
- treat hasDocument resources like Groups. Use of ?meta is meaningless, every
  MUST always be in the HTTP body. No xRegistry HTTP headers
- DELETE will NOT return the deleted resources, use "204"
- "latest" on a request that would result in "no latest version" is an error
- "contenttype" is ok to use with RESOURCEurl. No guarantee it matches the
  Content-Type of a the GET to RESOURCEurl though
- URI Template type : per RFC6570 section 3.2.1 (level 1)

Signed-off-by: Doug Davis <[email protected]>
@duglin
Copy link
Contributor Author

duglin commented Mar 7, 2024

Approved on the 3/7 call

@duglin duglin merged commit 7d8caae into xregistry:main Mar 7, 2024
2 checks passed
@duglin duglin deleted the Mar4 branch March 7, 2024 20:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant