Support for Multiremote and fixed many errors of current main branch

[SnakeDrak]

I have added support for multiremote and custom driver when we use the elements or mock matchers. Also I have added some fixes for the current main branch, however the npm run test:types is causing issues yet due to external library types. I will fix them in another PR.

It should fix or use as workaround for issue 106.

UPDATED: Types fixed as well.

[linux-foundation-easycla]

• ❌ The commit (53c93f8 ,15be0c5ac0ffc2d981365a526550b4f6c0ce46c6) is missing the User's ID, preventing the EasyCLA check. Consult GitHub Help to resolve.For further assistance with EasyCLA, please submit a support request ticket.

[linux-foundation-easycla]

• ❌ The commit (53c93f8 ,15be0c5ac0ffc2d981365a526550b4f6c0ce46c6) is missing the User's ID, preventing the EasyCLA check. Consult GitHub Help to resolve.For further assistance with EasyCLA, please submit a support request ticket.

[christian-bromann]

Thank you @SnakeDrak for the work on this and sorry for the late reply.

I just pushed a commit that might help avoid all the @ts-ignore comments in the PR. I rather would like to avoid them.

[christian-bromann]

I don't think we need this.

[christian-bromann]

Also can you explain how this patch will enable multiremote to work?

[SnakeDrak]

@christian-bromann I did it some month ago and I don't remember the full details. However, the original idea was to be able to pass the driver where you want to check. You could use something like:

expect(myInput).toHaveAttribute('class', 'form-control', browser)
expect(myInput).toHaveAttribute('class', 'md-form-control', app)

I remember the master branch was broken and I tried to fix it as well, for that reason you see some extra commits. At this moment, I am using my fork with this feature to support multiples driver at the same instance and to be able to test correctly each one.

You can check the tests included to know if it has a sense for you. Most probably I would have to update against master again.

[christian-bromann]

@SnakeDrak is there any interest to push this PR forward?

[pwespi]

Is there anything I can do to help pushing this forward? I would like to see the multiremote feature land in expect-webdriverio.

[lacell75]

Any news?

[christian-bromann]

@lacell75 as you can see, no. Would you like to pick this up?

[christian-bromann]

I will go ahead and close this as the branch starts to diverge to much from main. I would be happy for any contributions making this library compatible with multiremote.

Thanks for the work you put into this @SnakeDrak