feature: set custom table name for insertion #1375
Conversation
c9s
force-pushed
the
c9s/set-custom-table-name
branch
from
c9e4485
to
4064e81
Compare
|
@stephenafamo please take a look,, thanks! |
c9s
force-pushed
the
c9s/set-custom-table-name
branch
from
4064e81
to
07b90f1
Compare
|
What is the use case for this? |
for database sharding, for large datasets we need to move these data in different tables with the same schema |
|
this is the related ticket (discussion) |
templates/main/00_struct.go.tpl
Outdated
| @@ -71,6 +74,8 @@ var {{$alias.UpSingular}}TableColumns = struct { | |||
| {{end -}} | |||
| } | |||
|
|
|||
| const {{$alias.UpSingular}}TableName = "{{.Table.Name}}" | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is unnecessary, there is a struct with table names in the singleton. Let's reuse that.
Instead of making this change to SQLBoiler, did you consider having extra templates to add an extra method to the models? |
Thank you for the suggestion. I have considered the template approach, but it seems overly complex for this particular need. Given SQLBoiler's status as a modern ORM tool, I believe incorporating native support for database sharding would significantly enhance its utility for projects requiring robust scalability. This feature would not only simplify development but also align SQLBoiler with the evolving demands of large-scale applications. If SQLBoiler is unable to support this functionality, I may need to explore other solutions that offer built-in sharding capabilities to meet the scalability requirements of my project. I hope we can keep SQLBoiler as our primary ORM tool and avoid the need to switch. |
c9s
force-pushed
the
c9s/set-custom-table-name
branch
from
07b90f1
to
885eae9
Compare
|
Or maybe you prefer other API design? maybe we can discuss? |
No description provided.