Online DDL: removal of gh-ost and pt-osc strategies

[shlomi-noach]

Description

This PR completely removes any gh-ost and pt-online-schema-change support, functionality, and flags from Vitess Online DDL.

This means all of the following yields errors:

$ vtctldclient ApplySchema --ddl-strategy="gh-ost" ...
$ vtctldclient ApplySchema --ddl-strategy="pt-osc" ...
$ vttablet --gh-ost-path=...
$ vttablet --pt-osc-path=...

The remaining strategies are:

• vitess (aka online, both are allowed)
• mysql (not Online, but still managed)
• direct (unmanaged)

Documentation: vitessio/website#1933

Related Issue(s)

• Tracking: deprecation of gh-ost and pt-osc Online DDL strategies #15692
• Online DDL: unsupporting gh-ost DDL strategy #15693
• 20.0 docs: unsupporting gh-ost website#1725
• Docs: remove references to gh-ost and pt-osc, updaste documentation website#1933

Checklist

• "Backport to:" labels have been added if this change should be back-ported to release branches
• If this change is to be back-ported to previous releases, a justification is included in the PR description
• Tests were added or are not required
• Did the new or modified tests pass consistently locally and on CI?
• Documentation was added or is not required

Deployment Notes

[vitess-bot]

Review Checklist

Hello reviewers! 👋 Please follow this checklist when reviewing this Pull Request.

General

• Ensure that the Pull Request has a descriptive title.
• Ensure there is a link to an issue (except for internal cleanup and flaky test fixes), new features should have an RFC that documents use cases and test cases.

Tests

• Bug fixes should have at least one unit or end-to-end test, enhancement and new features should have a sufficient number of tests.

Documentation

• Apply the release notes (needs details) label if users need to know about this change.
• New features should be documented.
• There should be some code comments as to why things are implemented the way they are.
• There should be a comment at the top of each new or modified test to explain what the test does.

New flags

• Is this flag really necessary?
• Flag names must be clear and intuitive, use dashes (-), and have a clear help text.

If a workflow is added or modified:

• Each item in Jobs should be named in order to mark it as required.
• If the workflow needs to be marked as required, the maintainer team must be notified.

Backward compatibility

• Protobuf changes should be wire-compatible.
• Changes to _vt tables and RPCs need to be backward compatible.
• RPC changes should be compatible with vitess-operator
• If a flag is removed, then it should also be removed from vitess-operator and arewefastyet, if used there.
• vtctl command output order should be stable and awk-able.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 57.14286% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 67.97%. Comparing base (71b2cae) to head (5ec56a9).
Report is 13 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
go/vt/vttablet/onlineddl/executor.go	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️
go/vt/vtctl/vtctl.go	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #17626      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   67.77%   67.97%   +0.19%     
==========================================
  Files        1587     1586       -1     
  Lines      255798   255106     -692     
==========================================
+ Hits       173379   173412      +33     
+ Misses      82419    81694     -725     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[shlomi-noach]

Documentation: vitessio/website#1933

[shlomi-noach]

Documentation added. Good to review/merge.

[timvaillancourt]

👋👻