Fix Turbopack benchmark for next@canary #8421
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
turbo-orchestrator
bot
added
the
needs: triage
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
8 Ignored Deployments
|
|
This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking. Join @timneutkens and the rest of your teammates on |
|
✅ This change can build |
timneutkens
commented
Jun 11, 2024
| @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ pub fn build_test(module_count: usize, bundler: &dyn Bundler) -> TestApp { | |||
| .unwrap(); | |||
|
|
|||
| let npm = command("npm") | |||
| .args(["install", "--prefer-offline", "--loglevel=error"]) | |||
| .args(["install", "--loglevel=error"]) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
prefer-offline does not work reliably, it ends up causing resolving of dependencies to fail with an error saying that a package version does not exist that does exist on the npm registry.
sokra
approved these changes
Jun 11, 2024
🟢 Turbopack Benchmark CI successful 🟢Thanks |
|
timneutkens
force-pushed
the
06-11-fix_turbopack_benchmark_for_next_canary
branch
from
e4a338f
to
6494092
Compare
sokra
approved these changes
Jun 17, 2024
sokra
pushed a commit
to vercel/next.js
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 20, 2024
Upgrades Turbopack * vercel/turborepo#8421 <!-- Tim Neutkens - Fix Turbopack benchmark for next@canary --> * vercel/turborepo#8396 <!-- Tim Neutkens - Rename dev_runtime to browser_runtime --> * vercel/turborepo#8397 <!-- Tim Neutkens - Rename runtime/none to runtime/edge --> * vercel/turborepo#8398 <!-- Tim Neutkens - Remove unused Node.js runtime --> * vercel/turborepo#8399 <!-- Tim Neutkens - Rename build runtime to nodejs --> * vercel/turborepo#8400 <!-- Tim Neutkens - Rename dev runtime to browser --> <!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated. To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that you follow the checklist sections below. Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making: ## For Contributors ### Improving Documentation - Run `pnpm prettier-fix` to fix formatting issues before opening the PR. - Read the Docs Contribution Guide to ensure your contribution follows the docs guidelines: https://nextjs.org/docs/community/contribution-guide ### Adding or Updating Examples - The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md - Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md ### Fixing a bug - Related issues linked using `fixes #number` - Tests added. See: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs - Errors have a helpful link attached, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md ### Adding a feature - Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A discussion must be opened, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas) - Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number` - e2e tests added (https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs) - Documentation added - Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not. - Errors have a helpful link attached, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md ## For Maintainers - Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to understand the PR) - When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the conclusion - Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues - Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic behind a change ### What? ### Why? ### How? Closes NEXT- Fixes # -->
ForsakenHarmony
pushed a commit
to vercel/next.js
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 25, 2024
### Description - Ensures that the benchmarks don't fail on installing as `prefer-offline` doesn't work reliably. - Installs `react@rc` and `react-dom@rc` for `next@canary` as it requires React 19. - Updated the benchmark docs to show to to run one suite <!-- ✍️ Write a short summary of your work. If necessary, include relevant screenshots. --> ### Testing Instructions <!-- Give a quick description of steps to test your changes. -->
ForsakenHarmony
pushed a commit
to vercel/next.js
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 29, 2024
### Description - Ensures that the benchmarks don't fail on installing as `prefer-offline` doesn't work reliably. - Installs `react@rc` and `react-dom@rc` for `next@canary` as it requires React 19. - Updated the benchmark docs to show to to run one suite <!-- ✍️ Write a short summary of your work. If necessary, include relevant screenshots. --> ### Testing Instructions <!-- Give a quick description of steps to test your changes. -->
ForsakenHarmony
pushed a commit
to vercel/next.js
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 29, 2024
### Description - Ensures that the benchmarks don't fail on installing as `prefer-offline` doesn't work reliably. - Installs `react@rc` and `react-dom@rc` for `next@canary` as it requires React 19. - Updated the benchmark docs to show to to run one suite <!-- ✍️ Write a short summary of your work. If necessary, include relevant screenshots. --> ### Testing Instructions <!-- Give a quick description of steps to test your changes. -->
ForsakenHarmony
pushed a commit
to vercel/next.js
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 1, 2024
### Description - Ensures that the benchmarks don't fail on installing as `prefer-offline` doesn't work reliably. - Installs `react@rc` and `react-dom@rc` for `next@canary` as it requires React 19. - Updated the benchmark docs to show to to run one suite <!-- ✍️ Write a short summary of your work. If necessary, include relevant screenshots. --> ### Testing Instructions <!-- Give a quick description of steps to test your changes. -->
ForsakenHarmony
pushed a commit
to vercel/next.js
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 16, 2024
Upgrades Turbopack * vercel/turborepo#8421 <!-- Tim Neutkens - Fix Turbopack benchmark for next@canary --> * vercel/turborepo#8396 <!-- Tim Neutkens - Rename dev_runtime to browser_runtime --> * vercel/turborepo#8397 <!-- Tim Neutkens - Rename runtime/none to runtime/edge --> * vercel/turborepo#8398 <!-- Tim Neutkens - Remove unused Node.js runtime --> * vercel/turborepo#8399 <!-- Tim Neutkens - Rename build runtime to nodejs --> * vercel/turborepo#8400 <!-- Tim Neutkens - Rename dev runtime to browser --> <!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated. To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that you follow the checklist sections below. Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making: ## For Contributors ### Improving Documentation - Run `pnpm prettier-fix` to fix formatting issues before opening the PR. - Read the Docs Contribution Guide to ensure your contribution follows the docs guidelines: https://nextjs.org/docs/community/contribution-guide ### Adding or Updating Examples - The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md - Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md ### Fixing a bug - Related issues linked using `fixes #number` - Tests added. See: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs - Errors have a helpful link attached, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md ### Adding a feature - Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A discussion must be opened, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas) - Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number` - e2e tests added (https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs) - Documentation added - Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not. - Errors have a helpful link attached, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md ## For Maintainers - Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to understand the PR) - When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the conclusion - Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues - Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic behind a change ### What? ### Why? ### How? Closes NEXT- Fixes # -->
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
prefer-offlinedoesn't work reliably.react@rcandreact-dom@rcfornext@canaryas it requires React 19.Testing Instructions