fix: Use hygiene_with_config instead of hygiene (#8848)

### Description

<!--
  ✍️ Write a short summary of your work.
  If necessary, include relevant screenshots.
-->

### Testing Instructions

<!--
  Give a quick description of steps to test your changes.
-->

---------

Co-authored-by: 강동윤 (Donny) <[email protected]>

crates/turbopack-ecmascript/src/lib.rs

@@ -803,7 +803,14 @@ async fn gen_content_with_visitors(
  for visitor in root_visitors {
  program.visit_mut_with(&mut visitor.create());
  }
- program.visit_mut_with(&mut swc_core::ecma::transforms::base::hygiene::hygiene());
+ program.visit_mut_with(
+ &mut swc_core::ecma::transforms::base::hygiene::hygiene_with_config(
+ swc_core::ecma::transforms::base::hygiene::Config {
+ top_level_mark: eval_context.top_level_mark,
+ ..Default::default()
+ },
+ ),
+ );
  program.visit_mut_with(&mut swc_core::ecma::transforms::base::fixer::fixer(None));
 
  // we need to remove any shebang before bundling as it's only valid as the first

crates/turbopack-tests/tests/execution/turbopack/renaming/eval/input/index.js

@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+module; // <- This is important!
+
+it("should not rename variables when eval is used", () => {
+ const modules = {
+ x: (module) => {
+ "use strict";
+ return eval("module");
+ },
+ };
+ const moduleArrowFunction = (module) => {
+ "use strict";
+ return eval("module");
+ };
+ function moduleFunciton(module) {
+ "use strict";
+ return eval("module");
+ }
+ expect(modules.x(42)).toBe(42);
+ expect(moduleArrowFunction(42)).toBe(42);
+ expect(moduleFunciton(42)).toBe(42);
+});