tests(config-variations): Git schemes in repo URLs

[tony]

Related to vcs-python/vcspull#49, vcs-python/vcspull#426

In main repo URLs:

Main repo URLs require libvcs.url.git.GitURL support:

Scheme: [email protected]:org/repo.git
Example: [email protected]:tmux-python/tmuxp.git

Note: The workaround is to prepend git+ssh://[email protected]:tmux-python/tmuxp.git

Summary by Sourcery

Add support for detecting and parsing Git URLs with SCP-style syntax (e.g., [email protected]:org/repo.git) in the libvcs library

New Features:

• Support for parsing unprefixed SSH-style Git URLs without requiring a 'git+ssh://' prefix

Enhancements:

• Improve URL parsing to recognize SCP-style Git URL formats
• Update URL validation to explicitly support Git URLs in SCP syntax

Tests:

• Add test cases to verify detection of SCP-style Git URLs
• Extend test coverage for create_project function with SCP-style Git URLs

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request adds support for parsing Git URLs in the SCP format (e.g., [email protected]:user/repo.git). The changes involve updating the Git URL regex, the GitURL class, and the URL registry to correctly handle SCP-style URLs. Additionally, a test case has been added to verify the functionality.

No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Added support for parsing Git URLs in the SCP format (e.g., [email protected]:user/repo.git).	Added a test case to verify that create_project infers Git VCS for SCP-style URLs. Updated the Git URL regex to include SCP-style URLs. Updated the GitURL class to correctly validate SCP-style URLs. Updated the URL registry to correctly match SCP-style URLs.	src/libvcs/_internal/shortcuts.py tests/test_shortcuts.py src/libvcs/url/git.py docs/url/registry.md tests/url/test_registry.py

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
  review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
  @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
  want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
  (re-)generate the summary at any time.
• Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
  request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
• Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
  pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
  addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
• Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
  request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
  want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
  @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!
• Generate a plan of action for an issue: Comment @sourcery-ai plan on
  an issue to generate a plan of action for it.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 85.71429% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 54.28%. Comparing base (0cf3504) to head (de59052).
Report is 3 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/libvcs/_internal/shortcuts.py	50.00%	0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #490      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   54.05%   54.28%   +0.22%     
==========================================
  Files          40       40              
  Lines        3637     3644       +7     
  Branches      794      795       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits         1966     1978      +12     
+ Misses       1319     1311       -8     
- Partials      352      355       +3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[sourcery-ai]

Hey @tony - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

Overall Comments:

• Consider adding a test case with is_explicit=False to ensure the regex patterns work as expected without explicit matching.

Here's what I looked at during the review

• 🟢 General issues: all looks good
• 🟢 Security: all looks good
• 🟢 Testing: all looks good
• 🟡 Complexity: 1 issue found
• 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.}