Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cleanup wto parts in fwd_analyzer #807

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 27, 2024
Merged

Cleanup wto parts in fwd_analyzer #807

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 27, 2024

Conversation

elazarg
Copy link
Collaborator

@elazarg elazarg commented Nov 26, 2024

  • Make nesting field in wto_t mutable (cache)
  • Move component member check to wto.cpp and simplify
  • Make extrapolate and refine functions file-static instead of class-static

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced a new function, is_component_member, for checking membership in components.
  • Improvements
    • Enhanced const-correctness for several methods in the wto_t class, allowing for safer use in const contexts.
    • Simplified control flow in the forward analyzer by removing the visitor pattern and improving modularity.
  • Bug Fixes
    • Updated method signatures to reflect const-correctness, ensuring methods do not modify object state.

* mutable nesting field (cache)
* move is_component_member implementation to wto.cpp and simplify
* move class-static functions in fwd_analyzer.cpp to be file-static

Signed-off-by: Elazar Gershuni <[email protected]>

This comment was marked as off-topic.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5195871 and cb571ad.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • src/crab/fwd_analyzer.cpp (6 hunks)
  • src/crab/wto.cpp (4 hunks)
  • src/crab/wto.hpp (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 cppcheck (2.10-2)
src/crab/wto.cpp

[style] 302-302: The function 'nesting' is never used.

(unusedFunction)

🔇 Additional comments (10)
src/crab/wto.hpp (3)

95-96: Function declaration looks good.

Clear purpose, appropriate parameters and return type.


110-111: Const-correctness improvement looks good.

Methods don't modify object state, making them const is appropriate.


108-108: Verify thread safety of mutable cache.

The mutable cache is appropriate for performance optimization, but ensure thread safety if the class is used in concurrent contexts.

✅ Verification successful

Thread safety not a concern for this mutable cache

The mutable cache is used in a const member function nesting() for performance optimization. The concurrent test cases show that WTO instances are not shared between threads - each thread operates on its own separate WTO instance. The mutable cache is thread-safe by design through this non-shared usage pattern.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for concurrent usage patterns
rg -A 5 "std::thread|std::async|parallel|concurrent" 

Length of output: 849


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if the WTO class is used in test_verify.cpp
ast-grep --pattern 'class wto'

# Check the test_analyze_thread function implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'test_analyze_thread'

# Check for any mutex or lock usage around WTO
rg -A 3 "mutex|lock.*wto"

Length of output: 772


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation of test_analyze_thread to see if it uses WTO
rg -A 10 "^void test_analyze_thread"

# Check if WTO is used in concurrent contexts
rg -l "wto.*" src/test/test_verify.cpp

Length of output: 825


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if WTO is used in verify function
ast-grep --pattern 'verify($$$) {
  $$$
}'

# Look for WTO usage in verify
rg -A 5 "wto.*" src/crab/wto.hpp

Length of output: 3900

src/crab/wto.cpp (3)

Line range hint 268-290: LGTM

Proper const qualification for read-only method.


Line range hint 292-299: LGTM

Proper const qualification for read-only method.


Line range hint 302-308: Verify usage of nesting method

Static analysis reports this method as unused. Verify if this is a false positive.

🧰 Tools
🪛 cppcheck (2.10-2)

[style] 302-302: The function 'nesting' is never used.

(unusedFunction)

src/crab/fwd_analyzer.cpp (4)

18-18: Const correctness of _wto member

Declaring _wto as const wto_t enhances immutability and ensures that the well-known topological order remains unmodified after initialization. This change aligns with the intention of caching within wto_t using mutable members.


33-35: Adding const to accessor methods

Marking get_pre and get_post as const methods is appropriate since they do not modify the state of the interleaved_fwd_fixpoint_iterator_t instance. This change improves const-correctness and allows these methods to be called on const instances.


51-51: Const correctness of join_all_prevs method

Making join_all_prevs a const method is consistent with its purpose of aggregating predecessor states without altering the object's state.


134-136: Verify logic for skipping cycles

The assignment _skip = !entry_in_this_cycle; determines whether to skip analyzing the current cycle. Verify that this logic correctly handles scenarios where entry_label is within nested components of the cycle.

Run the following script to ensure that entry_label membership is accurately detected in nested components:

✅ Verification successful

Logic for skipping cycles is correctly implemented

The implementation in src/crab/wto.cpp shows that is_component_member recursively checks both direct and nested components:

  • Direct check: Matches if label equals component label
  • Nested check: Recursively searches through sub-components

The skip logic in fwd_analyzer.cpp correctly uses this function to determine if entry_label is present in any level of the cycle's hierarchy before deciding to skip analysis.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if entry_label is correctly identified as a member of any component in the cycle.

# Test: Search for occurrences of entry_label within the cycle components.
# Expect: Should return at least one match if entry_label is a member.

ast-grep --pattern $'is_component_member($_, $_)'

Length of output: 50


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for the implementation of is_component_member function
rg -U "is_component_member.*\{[\s\S]*?\}" -g "*.{cpp,hpp}"

# Search for any tests related to cycle analysis and component membership
rg -l "test.*cycle|test.*component" -g "*test*.{cpp,hpp}"

# Find all files containing cycle-related analysis
rg -l "cycle|component" -g "*.{cpp,hpp}"

Length of output: 756


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Get the implementation of the cycle class and its usage in WTO
rg -U "class\s+cycle" -g "*.hpp" -A 10

# Get the context around the skip logic in fwd_analyzer
rg -U "entry_in_this_cycle" -g "fwd_analyzer.cpp" -B 5 -A 5

# Look for any WTO-related tests
rg -U "TEST.*WTO" -g "*test*.cpp" -A 20

Length of output: 1610

src/crab/wto.hpp Show resolved Hide resolved
src/crab/wto.cpp Show resolved Hide resolved
src/crab/fwd_analyzer.cpp Show resolved Hide resolved
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

coverage: 89.769% (+0.09%) from 89.684%
when pulling cb571ad on const-wto
into 5195871 on main.

@elazarg elazarg merged commit 0a7a507 into main Nov 27, 2024
19 checks passed
@elazarg elazarg deleted the const-wto branch November 27, 2024 05:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants