-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 44
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Widening is too aggressive #441
Comments
This appears to be related to the TODO comment in |
so [0,1] to {0,2] widens to [0, +oo]. |
This was referenced Feb 1, 2023
Alan-Jowett
pushed a commit
to Alan-Jowett/ebpf-verifier
that referenced
this issue
Oct 15, 2024
vbpf#441) Bumps [external/bpf_conformance](https://github.com/Alan-Jowett/bpf_conformance) from `1bc5d19` to `0eed408`. - [Release notes](https://github.com/Alan-Jowett/bpf_conformance/releases) - [Commits](Alan-Jowett/bpf_conformance@1bc5d19...0eed408) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: external/bpf_conformance dependency-type: direct:production ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
As @caballa wrote in PR #423:
Before the fix in PR #423, valid programs passed verification, but now fail because of this issue so it is perceived as a regression.
vbpf/ebpf-samples#32 has a sample program that illustrates this (slightly more complex than Jorge's "essense" in PR #423 so that cmake won't unroll the loop).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: