Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reintroduce Try.mapFailure(Function<Throwable, Throwable>) #2759

Merged

Conversation

PratikBhusal
Copy link
Contributor

@PratikBhusal PratikBhusal commented Jan 15, 2024

@PratikBhusal
Copy link
Contributor Author

Note: The following changes are only a rebase to pull in the latest state of origin/master:

https://github.com/vavr-io/vavr/compare/edf8f10d1e3cef469af61e5f78532232001d4ec0..a92240bed247dcf6e29a1cc83995a64732d2aeec

@pivovarit pivovarit force-pushed the feature/reintroduce-try-mapFailure branch from a92240b to 7679f0a Compare September 29, 2024 15:07
@pivovarit pivovarit enabled auto-merge (squash) September 29, 2024 15:08
@pivovarit pivovarit merged commit 0ade953 into vavr-io:master Sep 29, 2024
6 checks passed
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 29, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 92.76%. Comparing base (e43e44b) to head (7679f0a).
Report is 64 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #2759      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     92.74%   92.76%   +0.02%     
- Complexity     5247     5262      +15     
============================================
  Files            89       89              
  Lines         12538    12545       +7     
  Branches       1604     1596       -8     
============================================
+ Hits          11628    11637       +9     
- Misses          721      722       +1     
+ Partials        189      186       -3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants