Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update dependency type-coverage to ^2.28.2 #170

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Apr 1, 2024

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
type-coverage ^2.27.1 -> ^2.28.2 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

plantain-00/type-coverage (type-coverage)

v2.28.2

Compare Source

v2.28.1

Compare Source

  • fix: --report-unused-ignore didn't count, enabled if --strict (115b159)

v2.28.0

Compare Source

  • feat: support --report-unused-ignore (7de9fd9)

v2.27.2

Compare Source


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am on the first day of the month" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Apr 1, 2024

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 6dae935

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

Copy link

codesandbox-ci bot commented Apr 1, 2024

This pull request is automatically built and testable in CodeSandbox.

To see build info of the built libraries, click here or the icon next to each commit SHA.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 1, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (22387b4) to head (b7f84c5).

❗ Current head b7f84c5 differs from pull request most recent head 6dae935. Consider uploading reports for the commit 6dae935 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main      #170   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            1         1           
  Lines          203       203           
  Branches       101       101           
=========================================
  Hits           203       203           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/type-coverage-2.x branch from 3428ec8 to 7bea8c6 Compare April 3, 2024 15:11
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency type-coverage to ^2.27.2 chore(deps): update dependency type-coverage to ^2.28.0 Apr 3, 2024
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/type-coverage-2.x branch from 7bea8c6 to b7f84c5 Compare April 4, 2024 02:28
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency type-coverage to ^2.28.0 chore(deps): update dependency type-coverage to ^2.28.1 Apr 4, 2024
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/type-coverage-2.x branch from b7f84c5 to 6dae935 Compare April 29, 2024 13:46
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency type-coverage to ^2.28.1 chore(deps): update dependency type-coverage to ^2.28.2 Apr 29, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

0 participants