Add benchmark for nixl with mooncake backend #170
+176
−22
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Pravein Govindan Kannan <[email protected]>
|
@praveingk Great! Do you observe any performance difference between UCX and Mooncake backend? |
|
@MaoZiming I can get line-rate with mooncake in the 100G nodes. It does throw out some "packet mismatch errors" sometimes since it picks the wrong HCA, mlx5_0 on one node, and mlx5_1 on the other node. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Added an option in benchmark_nixl to choose between UCX and Mooncake backend.
Mooncake doesn't support notifs for metadata exchanges.
Hence, added an out-of-band zmq socket for control messages.