Skip to content

Conversation

@gunpal5
Copy link
Collaborator

@gunpal5 gunpal5 commented Apr 9, 2025

Update to M.E.AI 9.4.0-preview.1.25207.5

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Upgraded our AI integration libraries to the latest preview, enhancing overall system performance and stability.
  • Refactor
    • Optimized asynchronous operations to deliver a more responsive experience.
  • Tests
    • Introduced additional validation to ensure reliable execution during parameterless function calls.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 9, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request updates several project files by upgrading package versions from 9.3.0-preview.1.25161.3 to 9.4.0-preview.1.25207.5 for Microsoft.Extensions.AI and its abstractions. It also modifies the method signature of InvokeCoreAsync in the MeaiFunction class to use a new AIFunctionArguments parameter type and returns a ValueTask instead of a Task. Additionally, a new test method is introduced with minor comment formatting adjustments.

Changes

Files Change Summary
src/libs/CSharpToJsonSchema/…/CSharpToJsonSchema.csproj
src/tests/AotConsole/…/AotConsole.csproj
src/tests/CSharpToJsonSchema.MeaiTests/…/CSharpToJsonSchema.MeaiTests.csproj
Updated package references from 9.3.0-preview.1.25161.3 to 9.4.0-preview.1.25207.5 for Microsoft.Extensions.AI/A.I.Abstractions
src/libs/CSharpToJsonSchema/MeaiFunction.cs Modified InvokeCoreAsync method signature: changed parameter from IEnumerable<KeyValuePair<string, object?>> to AIFunctionArguments and return type from Task<object?> to ValueTask<object?>
src/tests/CSharpToJsonSchema.MeaiTests/Meai_Tests.cs Added new test method ShouldInvokeTheFunctions_NoParameters2 and updated comment formatting for test attributes

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Caller
    participant MeaiFunction
    participant ToolService
    Caller->>MeaiFunction: InvokeCoreAsync(AIFunctionArguments, CancellationToken)
    MeaiFunction->>ToolService: Invoke tool with AIFunctionArguments
    ToolService-->>MeaiFunction: Return result
    MeaiFunction-->>Caller: Return ValueTask<object?> with result
Loading

Possibly related PRs

Poem

I'm a rabbit tapping keys in the code,
Hopping through changes on a merry mode.
Packages updated, functions refined,
New test hops ensuring all is aligned.
With each commit, I wiggle with delight,
Celebrating fresh code in the pale moonlight.
🐰🌟 Happy hops to progress!

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai plan to trigger planning for file edits and PR creation.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Apr 9, 2025

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you all sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
1 out of 2 committers have signed the CLA.

✅ gunpal5
❌ Gunpal Jain


Gunpal Jain seems not to be a GitHub user. You need a GitHub account to be able to sign the CLA. If you have already a GitHub account, please add the email address used for this commit to your account.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
src/tests/CSharpToJsonSchema.MeaiTests/CSharpToJsonSchema.MeaiTests.csproj (1)

18-18: Package version mismatch detected.

The Microsoft.Extensions.AI package has been updated to 9.4.0-preview.1.25207.5, while Microsoft.Extensions.AI.OpenAI remains at 9.3.0-preview.1.25161.3. This version inconsistency might cause compatibility issues.

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/tests/CSharpToJsonSchema.MeaiTests/Meai_Tests.cs (1)

68-93: New test method added for version 9.4.0-preview compatibility

This new test method appears to validate function invocation with the updated Microsoft.Extensions.AI package (9.4.0-preview.1.25207.5). It's correctly structured to test the GetStudentsList2 method which likely implements the new API contract.

Consider the following improvements:

  1. Add a comment explaining the purpose of this new test and how it differs from ShouldInvokeTheFunctions_NoParameters
  2. Uncomment the [TestMethod] attribute if you want this to run as part of the test suite
  3. Consider using a more descriptive name than GetStudentsList2 to indicate its relationship with the updated API
-    //[TestMethod]
+    [TestMethod]
+    // Tests function invocation with the updated Microsoft.Extensions.AI 9.4.0-preview API
     public async Task ShouldInvokeTheFunctions_NoParameters2()
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between afd05fd and 5ab4f86.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • src/libs/CSharpToJsonSchema/CSharpToJsonSchema.csproj (1 hunks)
  • src/libs/CSharpToJsonSchema/MeaiFunction.cs (1 hunks)
  • src/tests/AotConsole/AotConsole.csproj (1 hunks)
  • src/tests/CSharpToJsonSchema.MeaiTests/CSharpToJsonSchema.MeaiTests.csproj (1 hunks)
  • src/tests/CSharpToJsonSchema.MeaiTests/Meai_Tests.cs (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
src/libs/CSharpToJsonSchema/CSharpToJsonSchema.csproj (1)

20-20: LGTM - Package version update approved.

The update of Microsoft.Extensions.AI.Abstractions to 9.4.0-preview.1.25207.5 aligns with the other package updates in this PR, maintaining consistency across the solution.

src/libs/CSharpToJsonSchema/MeaiFunction.cs (2)

92-92: Performance improvement with ValueTask.

Changing the return type from Task<object?> to ValueTask<object?> is a good optimization that can reduce allocations for operations that might complete synchronously.


92-93:

Details

❌ Incorrect review comment

Type mismatch between InvokeCoreAsync parameter and GetArgsString parameter.

You've changed the parameter type from IEnumerable<KeyValuePair<string, object?>> to AIFunctionArguments, but the GetArgsString method still expects IEnumerable<KeyValuePair<string, object?>>. This will likely cause compilation or runtime errors.

Let's check how AIFunctionArguments works with the GetArgsString method:


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Check how AIFunctionArguments is implemented and used
rg -t cs "AIFunctionArguments" -A 10 -B 10

# Check for other implementations or overloads of GetArgsString
rg -t cs "GetArgsString" -A 5 -B 5

Length of output: 3730


Update: No Type Mismatch Detected
After verifying the current implementation, the call to GetArgsString(arguments) is valid because AIFunctionArguments is being passed where an IEnumerable<KeyValuePair<string, object?>> is expected. This implies that AIFunctionArguments either implements or is implicitly convertible to IEnumerable<KeyValuePair<string, object?>>, and therefore no compilation or runtime issues should occur.

  • The InvokeCoreAsync method now accepts an AIFunctionArguments parameter, which is directly used in GetArgsString.
  • The method signature for GetArgsString remains unchanged, and its expected parameter type aligns with how AIFunctionArguments is used.
  • Please verify that the definition of AIFunctionArguments indeed includes the necessary implementation for IEnumerable<KeyValuePair<string, object?>>; if it does, no further changes are required.

Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.

src/tests/CSharpToJsonSchema.MeaiTests/Meai_Tests.cs (2)

96-96: Comment formatting updated for consistency

The comment formatting change maintains consistency with other similar comments in the file.


124-126: Formatting adjustments for improved readability

These spacing changes improve code readability and maintain consistent formatting throughout the test class.


<ItemGroup>
<PackageReference Include="Microsoft.Extensions.AI" Version="9.3.0-preview.1.25161.3" />
<PackageReference Include="Microsoft.Extensions.AI" Version="9.4.0-preview.1.25207.5" />
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Verification agent

🧩 Analysis chain

Potential version mismatch between packages.

You've updated Microsoft.Extensions.AI to 9.4.0-preview.1.25207.5, but Microsoft.Extensions.AI.OpenAI remains at 9.3.0-preview.1.25161.3. This could lead to compatibility issues.

Consider updating Microsoft.Extensions.AI.OpenAI to match the version of Microsoft.Extensions.AI. Let's check if the 9.4.0-preview.1.25207.5 version exists for the OpenAI package:


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if the same version exists for Microsoft.Extensions.AI.OpenAI
curl -s https://api.nuget.org/v3-flatcontainer/microsoft.extensions.ai.openai/index.json | jq '.versions'

Length of output: 341


Action Required: Update Microsoft.Extensions.AI.OpenAI to 9.4.0-preview.1.25207.5

The version check confirms that Microsoft.Extensions.AI.OpenAI now has a "9.4.0-preview.1.25207.5" release available on NuGet. Since the Microsoft.Extensions.AI package in src/tests/AotConsole/AotConsole.csproj is already updated to this version, please update the corresponding Microsoft.Extensions.AI.OpenAI reference from "9.3.0-preview.1.25161.3" to "9.4.0-preview.1.25207.5" to avoid compatibility issues.

  • File Affected: src/tests/AotConsole/AotConsole.csproj (for Microsoft.Extensions.AI) and the corresponding project file(s) holding the Microsoft.Extensions.AI.OpenAI reference.
  • Action: Update Microsoft.Extensions.AI.OpenAI to version 9.4.0-preview.1.25207.5.

@gunpal5 gunpal5 requested a review from HavenDV April 9, 2025 14:27
@HavenDV HavenDV merged commit 734c757 into tryAGI:main Apr 9, 2025
3 of 4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants