Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[PF-] Move local inter-dependencies to caret semver range #4691

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

vedrani
Copy link
Contributor

@vedrani vedrani commented Mar 4, 2025

Description

Whenever we modify any picasso package in monorepo we also need to re-publish all dependant picasso packages creating lot of noise and on top of it creating problem to upgrade picasso in applications.

Idea is to move to caret semver range where for bugfixes and minors we don't change version of dependent packages considering semver range with caret will cover new version of changed package.

How to test

  • Temploy
  • FIXME: Add the steps describing how to verify your changes

Screenshots

Before. After.
Insert screenshots or screen recordings Insert screenshots or screen recordings

Development checks

  • Add changeset according to guidelines (if needed)
  • Double check if picasso-tailwind-merge requires major update (check its README.md)
  • Read CONTRIBUTING.md and Component API principles
  • Make sure that additions and changes on the design follow Toptal's BASE design, and it's been already discussed with designers at #-base-core
  • Annotate all props in component with documentation
  • Create examples for component
  • Ensure that deployed demo has expected results and good examples
  • Ensure the changed/created components have not caused accessibility issues. How to use accessibility plugin in storybook.
  • Self reviewed
  • Covered with tests (visual tests included)

Breaking change

  • codemod is created and showcased in the changeset
  • test alpha package of Picasso in StaffPortal

All development checks should be done and set checked to pass the
GitHub Bot: TODOLess action

PR commands

List of available commands:

  • @toptal-bot run package:alpha-release - Release alpha version
  • @toptal-anvil ping reviewers - Ping for reviews
PR Review Guidelines

When to approve? ✅

You are OK with merging this PR and

  1. You have no extra requests.
  2. You have optional requests.
    1. Add nit: to your comment. (ex. nit: I'd rename this variable from makeCircle to getCircle)

When to request changes? ❌

You are not OK with merging this PR because

  1. Something is broken after the changes.
  2. Acceptance criteria is not reached.
  3. Code is dirty.

When to comment (neither ✅ nor ❌)

You want your comments to be addressed before merging this PR in cases like:

  1. There are leftovers like unnecessary logs, comments, etc.
  2. You have an opinionated comment regarding the code that requires a discussion.
  3. You have questions.

How to handle the comments?

  1. An owner of a comment is the only one who can resolve it.
  2. An owner of a comment must resolve it when it's addressed.
  3. A PR owner must reply with ✅ when a comment is addressed.

@vedrani vedrani requested a review from denieler March 4, 2025 10:42
@vedrani vedrani self-assigned this Mar 4, 2025
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Mar 4, 2025

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: b8a7a2e

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

Copy link
Collaborator

@denieler denieler left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants