Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding condition checking if a payload is a device uplink. #95

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 13, 2024

Conversation

Freddyminu
Copy link
Collaborator

Decoder Description

Adding verification of payload, currently the payload code does not allow users to send variables to the device without running through the parsePayload function.

This PR fixes this.

Type of change

  • Adding a new Decoder of Connector
  • Adding a new Decoder of Network
  • Update or fixing an issue in existing Decoder

Decoder Information and Payload to test and review

  • Documentation of the hardware or protocol:
  • Payload of example the test the decoder:

Checklist for Adding a New Decoder

  • Created a new folder under ./decoders/network/ or ./decoders/connector/ with the name of your decoder.
  • Added a network.jsonc or connector.jsonc file that follows the structure defined in ./schema/.
  • Created version folders and added manifest.jsonc files for each version.
  • Followed the folder structure guidelines for manufacturer and sensor/device model.
  • The code has unit test and it's in TypeScript.

Additional Notes

Please add any other information that you think is important.

@Freddyminu Freddyminu self-assigned this Nov 13, 2024
Copy link
Member

@vitorfdl vitorfdl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Missing unit test to verify that the modification is working as intended

@FabianoEger FabianoEger merged commit d4ed580 into main Nov 13, 2024
12 checks passed
@FabianoEger FabianoEger deleted the fix/connector-khomp-itg-402 branch November 13, 2024 20:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants