Bump OVN-K #3284

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Open

skitt wants to merge 1 commit into submariner-io:devel from skitt:bump-ovsdb

+101 −38

Member

skitt commented Jan 28, 2025

No description provided.

skitt requested review from Oats87, aswinsuryan, dfarrell07, maayanf24, sridhargaddam, tpantelis, vthapar and yboaron as code owners

January 28, 2025 15:19

Contributor

submariner-bot commented Jan 28, 2025

🤖 Created branch: z_pr3284/skitt/bump-ovsdb
🚀 Full E2E won't run until the "ready-to-test" label is applied. I will add it automatically once the PR has 2 approvals, or you can add it manually.

dfarrell07 mentioned this pull request

Add OVN-K update to CI/CD maintenance docs submariner-io/submariner-website#1223

Open

Member Author

skitt commented Jan 28, 2025

It seems the obvious code change is incorrect.

Contributor

yboaron commented Jan 29, 2025

QQ: do we need to update also ovn-k version used on Kind to be in-sync with ovn-kubernetes/go-controller ?

Member Author

skitt commented Jan 29, 2025

QQ: do we need to update also ovn-k version used on Kind to be in-sync with ovn-kubernetes/go-controller ?

I don’t think so, but it wouldn’t hurt — this was done in relation to submariner-io/submariner-website#1223. In any case the unit test failure needs to be addressed; that’s independent of the image bump :-/.

Contributor

yboaron commented Jan 29, 2025

QQ: do we need to update also ovn-k version used on Kind to be in-sync with ovn-kubernetes/go-controller ?

I don’t think so, but it wouldn’t hurt — this was done in relation to submariner-io/submariner-website#1223. In any case the unit test failure needs to be addressed; that’s independent of the image bump :-/.

Ooops , I missed submariner-io/shipyard#1830 (review)
Thanks

yboaron added the ready-to-test label

Contributor

yboaron commented Jan 30, 2025

Probably fake ovn ovsdb_client should also be updated

Member Author

skitt commented Jan 30, 2025

ovn-kubernetes/ovn-kubernetes#3544 is the PR that breaks Submariner, but I haven’t figured out why.

Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 14, 2025

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further
activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

github-actions bot added the stale label

dfarrell07 removed the stale label

Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 5, 2025

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further
activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

github-actions bot added the stale label

tpantelis removed the stale label

Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 23, 2025

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further
activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

github-actions bot added the stale label

dfarrell07 removed the stale label

Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 9, 2025

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further
activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

github-actions bot added the stale label

dfarrell07 removed the stale label

Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 30, 2025

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further
activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

dfarrell07 removed the stale label

Contributor

github-actions bot commented Aug 6, 2025

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further
activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

github-actions bot added the stale label

dfarrell07 removed the stale label

Contributor

github-actions bot commented Aug 27, 2025

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further
activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

github-actions bot added the stale label


          Bump OVN-K

39cd029

Signed-off-by: Stephen Kitt <[email protected]>

skitt force-pushed the bump-ovsdb branch from 13cdda0 to 39cd029 Compare

August 27, 2025 13:16

github-actions bot removed the stale label

Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 12, 2025

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further
activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

github-actions bot added the stale label

dfarrell07 removed the stale label

Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 1, 2025

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further
activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

github-actions bot added the stale label

Member

dfarrell07 commented Oct 7, 2025

@skitt What's the status here? Still broken but we don't know why?

github-actions bot removed the stale label

Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 22, 2025

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further
activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

github-actions bot added the stale label

Member Author

skitt commented Oct 22, 2025

@skitt What's the status here? Still broken but we don't know why?

Exactly! Hopefully with the team ramping up on OVN-K you’ll be able to figure it out 😉.

github-actions bot removed the stale label

Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 6, 2025

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further
activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

github-actions bot added the stale label

tpantelis removed the stale label

Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 23, 2025

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further
activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

github-actions bot added the stale label

dfarrell07 removed the stale label

Member

dfarrell07 commented Nov 25, 2025

CC @yboaron @aswinsuryan can you guys take a look at this one, see what the current status is?

dfarrell07 assigned aswinsuryan

dfarrell07 added this to Submariner 0.22

dfarrell07 moved this to Todo in Submariner 0.22

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

aswinsuryan Awaiting requested review from aswinsuryan aswinsuryan is a code owner

dfarrell07 Awaiting requested review from dfarrell07 dfarrell07 is a code owner

maayanf24 Awaiting requested review from maayanf24 maayanf24 is a code owner

Oats87 Awaiting requested review from Oats87 Oats87 is a code owner

sridhargaddam Awaiting requested review from sridhargaddam sridhargaddam is a code owner

tpantelis Awaiting requested review from tpantelis tpantelis is a code owner

vthapar Awaiting requested review from vthapar vthapar is a code owner

yboaron Awaiting requested review from yboaron yboaron is a code owner

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.

Labels