Skip to content

[5.x] Add configurable @blueprint template base path #11632

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: 5.x
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

o1y
Copy link
Contributor

@o1y o1y commented Mar 28, 2025

Adds a new configuration option to customize where Statamic looks for templates when using @blueprint in collections to map templates to entry blueprints.

If template: @blueprint is set on the collection, by default it looks for a template that corresponds with the blueprint in
resources/views/{collection}/{template}.antlers.html.

  • With the new config option the user can set a different base path /resources/views/{blueprint_template_base_path}/{template}.antlers.html.

Adds a new configuration option to customize where Statamic looks for
templates when using `@blueprint` in collections.
@o1y o1y force-pushed the custom-blueprint-base-path branch from 101df2f to b2f56c1 Compare March 28, 2025 10:21
@jasonvarga
Copy link
Member

What's your actual use case for this?

@o1y
Copy link
Contributor Author

o1y commented Apr 25, 2025

I want to reuse the same set of templates (mapped to blueprints with the same name) across multiple collections without duplicating template files. This is my views folder:


resources/
└── views/
    ├── shared_blueprints/ 
    │   ├── page_builder.antlers.html
    │   ├── simple_page.antlers.html
    │   └── article.antlers.html
    └── ... 

Currently, ⁠template: @blueprint forces templates into collection-specific folders (⁠views/pages/, ⁠views/landing_pages/). This would require duplication. With the proposed config option, you could avoid this template dispatcher partial:

{{ partial src="shared_blueprints/{{ blueprint }}" }}

@jasonvarga
Copy link
Member

Gotcha so you just want to avoid the collection prefix and replace it with your own basically.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants