Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Caracal: Update monitoring stack components #381

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: stackhpc/2024.1
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

cityofships
Copy link
Member

prometheus-alertmanager: 0.27.0 -> 0.28.0
prometheus-blackbox-exporter: 0.24.0 -> 0.25.0
prometheus-cadvisor: 0.49.1 -> 0.49.2
prometheus-elasticsearch-exporter: 1.7.0 -> 1.8.0
prometheus-memcached-exporter: 0.14.2 -> 0.15.0
prometheus-mtail: 3.0.0-rc54 -> 3.0.8
prometheus-mysqld-exporter: 0.15.1 -> 0.16.0
prometheus-node-exporter: 1.7.0 -> 1.8.2
prometheus 2.50.1 -> 2.55.1

Co-authored-by: Piotr Parczewski [email protected]

Change-Id: I9359df23a41a600dd46dbc1812a54be57fd33f71

prometheus-alertmanager: 0.27.0 -> 0.28.0
prometheus-blackbox-exporter: 0.24.0 -> 0.25.0
prometheus-cadvisor: 0.49.1 -> 0.49.2
prometheus-elasticsearch-exporter: 1.7.0 -> 1.8.0
prometheus-memcached-exporter: 0.14.2 -> 0.15.0
prometheus-mtail: 3.0.0-rc54 -> 3.0.8
prometheus-mysqld-exporter: 0.15.1 -> 0.16.0
prometheus-node-exporter: 1.7.0 -> 1.8.2
prometheus 2.50.1 -> 2.55.1

Co-authored-by: Piotr Parczewski <[email protected]>

Change-Id: I9359df23a41a600dd46dbc1812a54be57fd33f71
@cityofships cityofships added the monitoring All things related to observability & telemetry label Jan 31, 2025
@cityofships cityofships requested a review from a team as a code owner January 31, 2025 15:06
@dougszumski
Copy link
Member

dougszumski commented Jan 31, 2025

This should be fine. Are we certain that there is no risk during the TSDB schema migration in prometheus 2.50.1 -> 2.55.1 ? Have you tried it? How long does it take on SMS lab?
We don't want to cause any unexpected impact at customer sites. Sorry to be a pain!

For others - the motivation of the backport is to prepare for Prometheus v3.0 in Epoxy, which requires upgrading to Prometheus 2.55.1 first.

@cityofships
Copy link
Member Author

This should be fine. Are we certain that there is no risk during the TSDB schema migration in prometheus 2.50.1 -> 2.55.1 ? Have you tried it? How long does it take on SMS lab? We don't want to cause any unexpected impact at customer sites. Sorry to be a pain!

For others - the motivation of the backport is to prepare for Prometheus v3.0 in Epoxy, which requires upgrading to Prometheus 2.55.1 first.

This change does not directly affect anybody, since we're controlling tags via https://github.com/stackhpc/stackhpc-kayobe-config/blob/stackhpc/2024.1/etc/kayobe/kolla-image-tags.yml. Only after things were tested, we'd bump up versions there.

@dougszumski
Copy link
Member

dougszumski commented Jan 31, 2025

This should be fine. Are we certain that there is no risk during the TSDB schema migration in prometheus 2.50.1 -> 2.55.1 ? Have you tried it? How long does it take on SMS lab? We don't want to cause any unexpected impact at customer sites. Sorry to be a pain!
For others - the motivation of the backport is to prepare for Prometheus v3.0 in Epoxy, which requires upgrading to Prometheus 2.55.1 first.

This change does not directly affect anybody, since we're controlling tags via https://github.com/stackhpc/stackhpc-kayobe-config/blob/stackhpc/2024.1/etc/kayobe/kolla-image-tags.yml. Only after things were tested, we'd bump up versions there.

It still needs testing before merging to the stable branch. Someone might refresh the tags for a security fix etc. without being fully aware of the change. You can make a kayobe config branch, point it at this backports branch and build it via https://github.com/stackhpc/stackhpc-kayobe-config/actions/workflows/stackhpc-container-image-build.yml or just replace the binary directly in the container in this case.

@cityofships
Copy link
Member Author

cityofships commented Jan 31, 2025

This should be fine. Are we certain that there is no risk during the TSDB schema migration in prometheus 2.50.1 -> 2.55.1 ? Have you tried it? How long does it take on SMS lab? We don't want to cause any unexpected impact at customer sites. Sorry to be a pain!
For others - the motivation of the backport is to prepare for Prometheus v3.0 in Epoxy, which requires upgrading to Prometheus 2.55.1 first.

This change does not directly affect anybody, since we're controlling tags via https://github.com/stackhpc/stackhpc-kayobe-config/blob/stackhpc/2024.1/etc/kayobe/kolla-image-tags.yml. Only after things were tested, we'd bump up versions there.

It still needs testing before merging to the stable branch. Someone might refresh the tags for a security fix etc. without being fully aware of the change. You can make a kayobe config branch, point it at this backports branch and build it via https://github.com/stackhpc/stackhpc-kayobe-config/actions/workflows/stackhpc-container-image-build.yml or just replace the binary directly in the container in this case.

Fair enough - draft until it's tested.

@cityofships cityofships marked this pull request as draft January 31, 2025 17:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
monitoring All things related to observability & telemetry
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants