Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Foward port downstream Caracal patches to stackhpc/master #678

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: stackhpc/master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Foward port downstream Caracal patches to stackhpc/master #678

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

seunghun1ee
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@seunghun1ee seunghun1ee self-assigned this Jan 31, 2025
@seunghun1ee seunghun1ee requested a review from a team as a code owner January 31, 2025 16:05
@Alex-Welsh
Copy link
Member

I think we want the sb relay, but not sure whether we need caso or not

@Alex-Welsh
Copy link
Member

Alex-Welsh commented Feb 5, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Confirmed we need both.
We will probably have some more work to do to bring in the recent handler changes to the caso deployment tasks

Patches for reference:
https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/924145
https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/773243
https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/914997

@Alex-Welsh
Copy link
Member

Confirmed we need both. We will probably have some more work to do to bring in the recent handler changes to the caso deployment tasks

Patches for reference: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/924145 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/773243 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/914997

Turns out we don't need cASO, which makes things way easier

@mnasiadka @seunghun1ee
ovn: Add support for OVN SB Relay
de72559 
Add support for deploying OVN SB relays [1].
This is enabled by default to improve large scale scenarios.

Default mechanism deploys one relay group per 50 ovn-controller hosts
and uses random but idempotent method to choose a relay for a given host.

neutron-server will connect directly to SB cluster, not via the relays.

[1]: https://docs.ovn.org/en/latest/tutorials/ovn-ovsdb-relay.html

Co-Authored-By: Krzysztof Tomaszewski <[email protected]>

Depends-On: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/928898

Change-Id: Id7d6973668d8b2b194913b533f8cb756c6708536
(cherry picked from commit 7b95939)
@seunghun1ee seunghun1ee force-pushed the fowardport-caracal-to-master branch from 95f1aba to de72559 Compare February 6, 2025 11:13
@seunghun1ee
Copy link
Member Author

Confirmed we need both. We will probably have some more work to do to bring in the recent handler changes to the caso deployment tasks
Patches for reference: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/924145 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/773243 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/914997

Turns out we don't need cASO, which makes things way easier

cASO commit was dropped

Alex-Welsh
Alex-Welsh approved these changes Feb 6, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@Alex-Welsh Alex-Welsh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm, might be safest for someone with more KA experience to review as well

@priteau priteau requested review from priteau and bbezak February 6, 2025 14:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@Alex-Welsh Alex-Welsh Alex-Welsh approved these changes

@priteau priteau Awaiting requested review from priteau

@bbezak bbezak Awaiting requested review from bbezak

Assignees

@seunghun1ee seunghun1ee

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@seunghun1ee @Alex-Welsh @mnasiadka