Solaris x86 and x86_64 patches (tested on Solaris 10 and 11) #21
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Sun compiler refuses to compile |
nzioki
pushed a commit
to nzioki/sbcl
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 6, 2018
Can't reliably base off rsp if next frame doesn't say how to restore rsp. Without this patch: > sbcl#19 0x000000000596193f in (labels sb-impl::restart-lisp in sb-ext:save-lisp-and-die) () > sbcl#20 0x000000000e98785f in Lcall () > Backtrace stopped: previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?) With this patch: > sbcl#19 0x000000000596193f in (labels sb-impl::restart-lisp in sb-ext:save-lisp-and-die) () > sbcl#20 0x000000000e98785f in Lcall () > sbcl#21 0x00007fa4a3be2bbd in __libc_start_main () > sbcl#22 0x00000000046fb009 in _start ()
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Currently the SBCL binaries provided on sbcl.org is for version 1.2.7, the binaries may work on Solaris 11 but cannot run on Solaris 10.
I have successfully built latest SBCL (1.4.3) x86 and x86_64 on Solaris 10, and the resulting binaries are confirmed working on clean Solaris 11 installations (thus the binary doesn't depend on GCC runtime at all). The main C compiler is GCC 5.5.0 from opencsw.org, but Oracle Developer Studio 12.5 (or 12.6) is also needed for compiling the
foo.cinsb-posixpackage.This PR contains all my changes. Some shell scripts must be called by
bashinstead ofsh(they're different on Solaris 10).Sample SBCL binaries (x86_64 version has
sb-threadsenabled) can be downloaded here: