Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

coverage: Further simplify extraction of mapping info from MIR #124615

Merged
merged 6 commits into from May 10, 2024

Conversation

Zalathar
Copy link
Contributor

@Zalathar Zalathar commented May 2, 2024

This is another round of rearrangement and simplification that builds on top of the changes made to mapping-extraction by #124603.

The overall theme is to take the computation of bcb_has_mappings and test_vector_bitmap_bytes out of the main body of generate_coverage_spans, which then lets us perform a few other small changes that had previously been held up by the need to work around those computations.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented May 2, 2024

r? @jieyouxu

rustbot has assigned @jieyouxu.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels May 2, 2024
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented May 2, 2024

Some changes occurred to MIR optimizations

cc @rust-lang/wg-mir-opt

@rustbot rustbot added the A-code-coverage Area: Source-based code coverage (-Cinstrument-coverage) label May 2, 2024
@Zalathar
Copy link
Contributor Author

Zalathar commented May 2, 2024

@rustbot blocked

@rustbot rustbot added S-blocked Status: Marked as blocked ❌ on something else such as an RFC or other implementation work. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 2, 2024
@bors

This comment was marked as resolved.

@Zalathar
Copy link
Contributor Author

Zalathar commented May 6, 2024

Rebased now that #124603 has been merged.

(This will still have some tiny conflicts with #124571, but oh well.)

@rustbot ready

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-blocked Status: Marked as blocked ❌ on something else such as an RFC or other implementation work. labels May 6, 2024
@jieyouxu
Copy link
Contributor

jieyouxu commented May 8, 2024

Rerolling for reviewers more familiar with mir

r? mir

@rustbot rustbot assigned davidtwco and unassigned jieyouxu May 8, 2024
@davidtwco
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 10, 2024

📌 Commit 0c12a3b has been approved by davidtwco

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 10, 2024
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request May 10, 2024
…idtwco

coverage: Further simplify extraction of mapping info from MIR

This is another round of rearrangement and simplification that builds on top of the changes made to mapping-extraction by rust-lang#124603.

The overall theme is to take the computation of `bcb_has_mappings` and `test_vector_bitmap_bytes` out of the main body of `generate_coverage_spans`, which then lets us perform a few other small changes that had previously been held up by the need to work around those computations.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 10, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 4 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#124615 (coverage: Further simplify extraction of mapping info from MIR)
 - rust-lang#124778 (Fix parse error message for meta items)
 - rust-lang#124807 (Migrate `run-make/rustdoc-io-error` to `rmake.rs`)
 - rust-lang#124957 (Make `Ty::builtin_deref` just return a `Ty`)

Failed merges:

 - rust-lang#124888 (Migrate `run-make/rustdoc-output-path` to rmake)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 10, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 5 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#124615 (coverage: Further simplify extraction of mapping info from MIR)
 - rust-lang#124778 (Fix parse error message for meta items)
 - rust-lang#124797 (Refactor float `Primitive`s to a separate `Float` type)
 - rust-lang#124888 (Migrate `run-make/rustdoc-output-path` to rmake)
 - rust-lang#124957 (Make `Ty::builtin_deref` just return a `Ty`)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit c768a0e into rust-lang:master May 10, 2024
6 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.80.0 milestone May 10, 2024
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 10, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#124615 - Zalathar:extracted-mappings, r=davidtwco

coverage: Further simplify extraction of mapping info from MIR

This is another round of rearrangement and simplification that builds on top of the changes made to mapping-extraction by rust-lang#124603.

The overall theme is to take the computation of `bcb_has_mappings` and `test_vector_bitmap_bytes` out of the main body of `generate_coverage_spans`, which then lets us perform a few other small changes that had previously been held up by the need to work around those computations.
@Zalathar Zalathar deleted the extracted-mappings branch May 10, 2024 23:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-code-coverage Area: Source-based code coverage (-Cinstrument-coverage) S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants