Skip to content

feat: extract stack-array-size-threshold conf from array-size-threshold#17165

Open
theirix wants to merge 3 commits into
rust-lang:masterfrom
theirix:conf_stack-array-size-threshold
Open

feat: extract stack-array-size-threshold conf from array-size-threshold#17165
theirix wants to merge 3 commits into
rust-lang:masterfrom
theirix:conf_stack-array-size-threshold

Conversation

@theirix
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@theirix theirix commented Jun 5, 2026

Extract stack-array-size-threshold conf from array-size-threshold. It allows tuning array-size-threshold config value without changing large_stack_arrays lint behaviour.

Refers #17074

changelog: [large_const_arrays]: introduce stack-array-size-threshold configuration

theirix added 3 commits June 5, 2026 20:54
…shold`

It allows tuning `array-size-threshold` config value without
changing `large_stack_arrays` lint behaviour.

Refers rust-lang#17074
@theirix theirix marked this pull request as ready for review June 5, 2026 20:43
@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties label Jun 5, 2026
@rustbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jun 5, 2026

r? @llogiq

rustbot has assigned @llogiq.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

Why was this reviewer chosen?

The reviewer was selected based on:

  • Owners of files modified in this PR: 8 candidates
  • 8 candidates expanded to 8 candidates
  • Random selection from Jarcho, dswij, llogiq, samueltardieu

@rustbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jun 5, 2026

⚠️ Warning ⚠️

  • There are issue links (such as #123) in the commit messages of the following commits.
    Please move them to the PR description, to avoid spamming the issues with references to the commit, and so this bot can automatically canonicalize them to avoid issues with subtree.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants