add new lint non_std_lazy_statics
#13770
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
pitaj
changed the title
non_std_lazy_statics]non_std_lazy_statics
detect usage of `once_cell::sync::Lazy` and `lazy_static!`, recommending usage of `std::sync::LazyLock` instead
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably a5e46a6) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
|
Thank you. This looks like a solid improvement, it just needs a rebase. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
fixes #12895
detects usage of
once_cell::sync::Lazyandlazy_static!, recommending usage ofstd::sync::LazyLockinsteadMany thanks to @J-ZhengLi for putting in most of the work in #12968
changelog: new lint
non_std_lazy_statics