Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

clippy::redundant_locals is not a correctness lint #13747

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 7, 2025
Merged

clippy::redundant_locals is not a correctness lint #13747

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
6 changes: 3 additions & 3 deletions clippy_lints/src/redundant_locals.rs
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -17,9 +17,9 @@ declare_clippy_lint! {
/// Checks for redundant redefinitions of local bindings.
///
/// ### Why is this bad?
/// Redundant redefinitions of local bindings do not change behavior and are likely to be unintended.
/// Redundant redefinitions of local bindings do not change behavior other than variable's lifetimes and are likely to be unintended.
///
/// Note that although these bindings do not affect your code's meaning, they _may_ affect `rustc`'s stack allocation.
/// These rebindings can be intentional to shorten the lifetimes of variables because they affect when the `Drop` implementation is called. Other than that, they do not affect your code's meaning but they _may_ affect `rustc`'s stack allocation.
///
/// ### Example
/// ```no_run
Expand All @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ declare_clippy_lint! {
/// ```
#[clippy::version = "1.73.0"]
pub REDUNDANT_LOCALS,
correctness,
suspicious,
"redundant redefinition of a local binding"
}
declare_lint_pass!(RedundantLocals => [REDUNDANT_LOCALS]);
Expand Down
Loading