-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 912
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Ensure latched messages are updated on every split #2261
Open
ggorjup
wants to merge
2
commits into
ros:noetic-devel
Choose a base branch
from
ggorjup:noetic-devel
base: noetic-devel
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The
[]
operator does exactly what's expected here, in case the key doesn't exist in the map, it will be created and when it does exist, it will be updated.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the suggestion - the
[]
operator is indeed cleaner since it removes the need for the extra manual check (in lines 351-354).I'll try to update it shortly (I don't have the test environment handy anymore).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@AndreasNagel I tried your suggestion and unfortunately it fails to build:
error: no matching function for call to ‘rosbag::OutgoingMessage::OutgoingMessage()’
I believe this is due to the behavior of the
[]
operator when a key is not found in the map. From the docs:When a key is missing, the
[]
operator tries to create anOutgoingMessage
object with an empty constructor that does not exist:OutgoingMessage()
. (The object seems to only have one constructor that requires 4 arguments.)I didn't find an easy way to go around this without creating an empty constructor for
OutgoingMessage
- I'd prefer to avoid introducing a change like that.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good point, I missed that
OutgoingMessage
doesn't have a default constructor. I agree, there's no point in creating one just to use the[]
operator. There's insert_or_assign in c++17, but nothing with equivalent functionality in c++14, so what you have there is probably as good as it gets. Still hoping, that this change will get merged one day.