Remove incorrect sentence

[llrs]

The last sentence of maintenance_evolution repeated something on the check-list with a different organization name. I think it can be removed to avoid confusion.

[mpadge]

Thanks @llrs !

[mpadge]

@maelle I have approved; can you please merge? Merci!

[maelle]

I'll try to come back to this PR soon. I need to update the Spanish file and Portuguese PR if it exists.

[maelle]

I don't think the sentence is actually incorrect: if a package is unarchived from ropensci-archive it should go to ropenscilabs (sometimes it goes to ropensci but it's a mistake 😅 ).

[llrs]

Oh, sorry, I thought it would go back to the ropensci repository if fit. Does it go to ropenscilab first to ensure it is up to rOpenSci standards?

[maelle]

Yes in theory at least that was the idea.

@mpadge any comment?

[mpadge]

I think removing that sentence is good. As far as I'm aware, there haven't even been any unarchived packages for ... years. And going by the unused = unnecessary principle, this removes cruft from the dev guide, so 👍