[do not merge] RFile Prototype #19151
Draft
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
With this change, querying for object "a/b/c" will only try to fetch object "c" from directory "b" from directory "a", and not any combination thereof (like object "b/c" from directory "a" or object "a/b/c").
Test Results 20 files 20 suites 3d 21h 44m 16s ⏱️ For more details on these failures, see this check. Results for commit 6a8d2b4. ♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results. |
|
Just to put this on the table https://its.cern.ch/jira/browse/ROOT-7400 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This Pull request:
Draft PR for the new RFile prototype, using a non-RDirectory-based approach (an alternative PR using a RDirectory-based approach will follow soon).
Introduces
ROOT::Experimental::RFilewhich presents a new, minimal interface for reading and writing data to a ROOT file.NOTE: the commit history is a bit messy at the moment, but it's not meant to be "review-ready"; it's more to showcase the current progress of the prototype.