Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[iCubGenova07] Change calibration values after maintenance #718

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 5, 2025

Conversation

AntonioConsilvio
Copy link
Contributor

What changes:

This PR updates the calibration and configuration files after maintenance, check the icub-tech-support issue:

cc @filippoborgogni @reafrancesco

@AntonioConsilvio AntonioConsilvio self-assigned this Mar 5, 2025
Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hello @AntonioConsilvio, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

Summary of Changes

This pull request addresses issue #1925 in the icub-tech-support repository by updating calibration and configuration files for the iCubGenova07 robot, specifically focusing on the right arm. The changes involve modifications to the right-arm-calib.xml and right-arm-eb28-j8_11-mec.xml files, as well as a minor change to general.xml. The calibration values, home positions, and coupling matrices have been adjusted to reflect maintenance performed on the robot.

Highlights

  • Calibration Update: The calibration values in right_arm-calib.xml have been updated, including calibration1, calibration2, calibration4, calibration5, startupPosition, and startupVelocity parameters, to reflect the current state of the robot after maintenance.
  • Mechanical Coupling Adjustment: The matrixJ2M and matrixM2J parameters in right_arm-eb28-j8_11-mec.xml have been modified to correct the mechanical couplings of the right arm.
  • General Configuration: A minor formatting change was made to general.xml to ensure consistency in the useRawEncoderData parameter.

Changelog

  • iCubGenova07/calibrators/right_arm-calib.xml
    • Updated positionHome and velocityHome values in the HOME group (lines 14-15).
    • Modified calibration1, calibration2, calibration4, and calibration5 values in the CALIBRATION group (lines 21-25).
    • Adjusted startupPosition and startupVelocity values (lines 29-30).
    • Removed an extra blank line at the end of the file (line 49).
  • iCubGenova07/general.xml
    • Added a space to the useRawEncoderData parameter for formatting consistency (line 8).
  • iCubGenova07/hardware/mechanicals/right_arm-eb28-j8_11-mec.xml
    • Corrected the matrixJ2M and matrixM2J parameters in the COUPLINGS group (lines 32-44).
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.


Did you know?

Robots are increasingly used in hazardous environments, such as bomb disposal and nuclear power plant maintenance, to protect human workers.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This PR updates calibration and configuration files after maintenance. The changes seem reasonable, but I have a few suggestions for improvement.

Summary of Findings

  • Inconsistent spacing: There are some inconsistencies in spacing within the XML files. Consistent spacing improves readability.
  • Matrix sign change: The sign change in the matrix parameters should be verified for correctness and impact on the robot's behavior.
  • Startup position change: The startup position for joint 8 has been changed from 30 to 50. This change should be verified for correctness and impact on the robot's behavior.

Merge Readiness

The pull request updates calibration and configuration files after maintenance. While the changes seem reasonable, the sign change in the matrix parameters and the startup position change should be verified for correctness and impact on the robot's behavior. I am unable to approve the pull request, and users should have others review and approve this code before merging. I recommend addressing the matrix sign change and startup position change before merging.

Comment on lines +32 to +41
<param name ="matrixJ2M">
1.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
1.000 +1.000 0.000 0.000
-1.000 +1.000 0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000 1.000 0.000
0.000 0.000 0.000 1.000
</param>

<param name ="matrixM2J">
1.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
-1.000 +1.000 0.000 0.000
+1.000 +1.000 0.000 0.000
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can merge this although we're still inquiring about the correct matrix.

@pattacini pattacini merged commit aca3078 into robotology:master Mar 5, 2025
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants