feat(engine): Implemented JPStandardGridAccumulator #1047
Conversation
|
Note Currently processing new changes in this PR. This may take a few minutes, please wait... 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces a new geographic processing component called the JPStandardGridAccumulator. A new module and processor have been added to handle the division of input geometries into a 1km mesh grid, complete with a dedicated factory and error variants in the geometry processing errors. In addition, the changes add a new workflow configuration that integrates this processor, extend the geometry API with a method to extract all coordinates, and introduce a new module for Japan-specific mesh code computations. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant FR1 as FileReader (Polygons)
participant FR2 as FileReader (Power Lines)
participant JP as JPStandardGridAccumulator
participant GW as GeoJsonWriter
FR1->>JP: Read polygon GeoJSON
FR2->>JP: Read power line GeoJSON
JP->>JP: Process geometry (clip, grid binding, error handling)
JP->>GW: Forward processed features
GW-->>GW: Write output GeoJSON
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Tip You can generate walkthrough in a markdown collapsible section to save space.Enable the 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
✅ Deploy Preview for reearth-flow ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
engine/runtime/types/src/jpmesh.rs (1)
34-75: Refactor opportunity for repeated intervals.
Match arms are valid, but consider mapping intervals into a single data structure or table to simplify code maintenance.engine/runtime/action-processor/src/geometry/jp_standard_grid_accumulator.rs (2)
25-59: Consider parameterizing mesh size inparameter_schema.Currently,
parameter_schemareturnsNone, effectively hardcoding the 1km mesh size. If you plan to support different mesh sizes (e.g., 80km, 10km, 500m, etc.), providing a schema for these parameters (e.g., a simple enum or integer field) would make this processor more flexible.fn parameter_schema(&self) -> Option<schemars::schema::RootSchema> { - None + // Example: Provide a schema for different mesh sizes + let schema = schemars::schema_for!(MyMeshParams); + Some(schema) }
129-208: Refactor repetitive geometry clipping/intersection logic.The
matcharms for LineString, MultiLineString, Polygon, and MultiPolygon contain similar intersection logic. While it's functional, consider extracting these common patterns into a shared helper function to reduce duplication and maintenance overhead.-fn bind_geometry_into_mesh_2d(...) - match &geometry { - Geometry::LineString(line_string) => { - ... - } - Geometry::MultiLineString(...) - Geometry::Polygon(...) - Geometry::MultiPolygon(...) - ... - } +fn bind_geometry_into_mesh_2d(...) { + // Example: Consolidate the intersection logic in a common function that + // takes input geometry and returns the clipped/intersected geometry. + // This approach could reduce repetitive code paths for each geometry variant. + // ... +}
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
engine/runtime/action-processor/src/geometry.rs(1 hunks)engine/runtime/action-processor/src/geometry/errors.rs(1 hunks)engine/runtime/action-processor/src/geometry/jp_standard_grid_accumulator.rs(1 hunks)engine/runtime/action-processor/src/geometry/mapping.rs(2 hunks)engine/runtime/examples/fixture/workflow/requirement/plateau4/a001-7/jp_standard_grid_accumulator.yml(1 hunks)engine/runtime/geometry/src/types/geometry.rs(2 hunks)engine/runtime/types/src/jpmesh.rs(1 hunks)engine/runtime/types/src/lib.rs(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (18)
engine/runtime/types/src/lib.rs (1)
9-9: Addition of the jpmesh module looks good.The addition of the new
jpmeshmodule is aligned with the PR's objective to implement the Japanese standard mesh grid functionality. This extends the type system to support the new geographic processing capabilities.engine/runtime/action-processor/src/geometry.rs (1)
19-19: Addition of jp_standard_grid_accumulator module looks correct.The new module is appropriately placed within the geometry module hierarchy, following the established pattern for other geometric processors like
convex_hull_accumulator. This matches the PR's objective of implementing the JPStandardGridAccumulator functionality.engine/runtime/action-processor/src/geometry/mapping.rs (2)
15-15: Import of JPStandardGridAccumulatorFactory is well placed.This import follows the same pattern as the other factory imports and is alphabetically ordered correctly in the import list.
61-61: Registration of the JPStandardGridAccumulatorFactory is correct.The factory is properly added to the
factoriesvector, allowing the system to create instances of the JP Standard Grid Accumulator when needed. This ensures the new processor can be referenced in workflow configurations.engine/runtime/examples/fixture/workflow/requirement/plateau4/a001-7/jp_standard_grid_accumulator.yml (1)
1-60: Example workflow configuration looks appropriate.The workflow configuration properly demonstrates the use of the new JPStandardGridAccumulator action. It reads GeoJSON data from multiple sources (polygons and power lines), processes them with the new accumulator, and writes the results to an output file.
A few observations:
- The workflow accepts input files as environment variables
- The workflow includes two input sources connecting to the JPStandardGridAccumulator
- The workflow correctly chains the accumulator output to a GeoJsonWriter
This configuration aligns with the PR's objective of implementing and demonstrating the Japanese standard mesh grid functionality.
engine/runtime/action-processor/src/geometry/errors.rs (1)
106-109: No issues found with the new error variants.
They follow the established naming convention for error variants and properly align with the codebase’s pattern.engine/runtime/geometry/src/types/geometry.rs (2)
14-14: Import addition is necessary and consistent.
This is required for using theCoordinatetype in the new method.
138-205: Comprehensive coordinate extraction method.
Implementation correctly enumerates all geometry types for gathering coordinates. This matches the existing architectural style and appears sound for various geometry variants.engine/runtime/types/src/jpmesh.rs (7)
1-4: Imports look appropriate.
No apparent issues or redundancies.
6-20: JPMeshType variants appear well-defined.
Documented variants are clear and consistent with mesh scale definitions.
77-81: Struct definition is concise.
No apparent issues with the design; field visibility and naming look good.
83-215: Implementation details for mesh code creation and transformations.
The methods (e.g.,from_inside_bounds,downscale,upscale) are clear and logically consistent. Be mindful of performance ifboundsis very large, which can produce large vectors of mesh codes.
216-345: Comprehensive coordinate-to-mesh conversion logic.
Your calculations for splitting lat/lon into seeds look correct for the mesh specification. Optional: Add range checks for out-of-Japan coordinates if needed by your domain.
346-582: Extensive test coverage.
The macros and test cases thoroughly verify mesh code generation, bounds, scaling, and corner cases. This is robust and well-structured.
22-32:✅ Verification successful
Ordering is reversed based on code length.
The implementation is correct as long as in your domain the “biggest” mesh type has the smallest ordering.Please confirm that the largest mesh type is intended to be “lesser” in sorting or comparisons. You may run this script to identify relevant usage of type comparisons:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Searching for potential usage of ordering or sorting across the repo. rg -A 5 "JPMeshType"Length of output: 20445
Ordering Verification: Confirmed Intentional Behavior
After searching for howJPMeshTypeis used throughout the repository, it’s clear that the reverse ordering oncode_length()is deliberate. Mesh types with a shorter code length (which correspond to larger areas, e.g.,Mesh80km) are intended to compare as greater than those with longer code lengths (smaller areas). This is further validated by test assertions (e.g.,assert!(mesh_types[i - 1] > mesh_types[i])) verifying the descending order of mesh types.No changes are necessary.
engine/runtime/action-processor/src/geometry/jp_standard_grid_accumulator.rs (3)
1-3: No immediate issues found with imports.All the imported modules and crates appear relevant and correctly scoped.
22-24: Factory struct is well-defined.Having a dedicated factory struct here follows a good design pattern, enabling easier maintenance, extensibility, and potential parameterization in the future.
64-117: Verify coordinate system and potential performance implications.
- Coordinate System: Japanese mesh codes typically expect WGS84 (latitude/longitude). If the input geometry is in another projection, the computed mesh might be incorrect. Consider ensuring or documenting that the geometry must be in lat/lon.
- Performance: For large coverage areas, iterating over every 1km mesh code could be computationally intensive. If the bounding rectangle is huge, you might generate a very large number of mesh codes. Consider providing a warning or limit if the bounding box exceeds a practical size.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (10)
engine/schema/actions_en.json (1)
2742-2758: New Action "JPStandardGridAccumulator" is well-defined and consistent with existing action definitions.The JSON object correctly specifies the fields:
- name: "JPStandardGridAccumulator"
- type: "processor"
- description: "Divides the input geometry into Japanese standard (1km) mesh grid."
- parameter: set to null (which is acceptable given that no additional parameters are required in this initial implementation)
- builtin: true
- inputPorts: ["default"]
- outputPorts: ["default", "rejected"]
- categories: ["Geometry"]
Everything follows the established pattern of similar processors in the schema.
Suggestion for future flexibility:
Since the PR notes the potential to support other mesh grid sizes (e.g., 80km, 10km, 500m, etc.) with minimal changes, it might be useful to consider adding an optional parameter (e.g., "gridSize") with a default value of "1km." This would make the processor more configurable for future use cases without requiring significant changes to the underlying implementation.engine/schema/actions_ja.json (1)
2742-2758: New Processor Definition for JPStandardGridAccumulator is well-structured.
The JSON entry clearly defines the new processor—its name, type, description, port configuration, and built-in flag—which aligns with the conventions used throughout the schema. The description concisely explains that it divides the input geometry into a Japanese standard (1km) mesh grid.
As noted in the PR objectives, while the current implementation supports a 1km grid, consider adding an optional parameter for grid size in a future update to easily accommodate other resolutions. This additional flexibility would future-proof the design with minimal changes.engine/schema/actions.json (1)
2742-2758: JPStandardGridAccumulator Action Added Correctly
The new action definition correctly implements the JPStandardGridAccumulator as a processor with a clear description and appropriate port configuration. The use of"parameter": nullis acceptable given the current scope (supporting only the 1km mesh grid).Suggestion: In the future, if you plan to expose different mesh grid sizes (such as 80km, 10km, 500m, etc.), consider adding a configurable parameter instead of
null. For example:- "parameter": null, + "parameter": { + "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#", + "title": "JPStandardGridAccumulatorParam", + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "meshSize": { + "type": "string", + "enum": ["1km", "500m", "250m", "100m", "80km", "10km"], + "default": "1km", + "description": "Mesh size for the Japanese standard grid" + } + } + },This would allow for future extension while keeping backward compatibility.
engine/schema/actions_fr.json (1)
2742-2758: Review ofJPStandardGridAccumulatorEntry.
- Language Consistency: The description is currently in English ("Divides the input geometry into Japanese standard (1km) mesh grid") while the rest of the file uses French for descriptions. For consistency in the French schema, consider translating the description—for example: "Divise la géométrie d'entrée selon la grille standard japonaise (1km)".
- Parameter Extensibility: Although the implementation is focused on a 1km mesh grid, the PR objectives mention the potential to support various grid sizes with minimal changes. It might be beneficial to consider exposing an optional parameter in the future to adjust the grid size dynamically.
engine/schema/actions_zh.json (1)
2742-2758: JPStandardGridAccumulator Processor Entry is Well-DefinedThe new processor entry clearly aligns with the PR objective by introducing the JPStandardGridAccumulator. Its configuration adheres to the established pattern for geometry processors, with a concise description and defined input/output ports. Since the initial implementation is strictly for a 1km mesh grid, the current
"parameter": nullsetting is acceptable. However, to facilitate future extensibility (e.g., supporting mesh grid sizes like 80km, 10km, 500m, etc.), you might consider parameterizing the grid size. For instance, adding an optional parameter (e.g.,"meshSize") could ease future modifications with minimal changes.If desired, you can use the diff below to introduce an optional parameter:
- "parameter": null, + "parameter": { + "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#", + "title": "JPStandardGridAccumulatorParam", + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "meshSize": { + "type": "number", + "default": 1.0, + "description": "Mesh grid size in kilometers" + } + } + },This refactor would make the processor more flexible for when alternative mesh sizes need to be supported.
engine/runtime/action-processor/src/geometry/jp_standard_grid_accumulator.rs (5)
81-86: Consider providing more specific error context when rejecting a feature.When rejecting features due to missing bounds, it would be helpful to include more context about why the feature was rejected.
- fw.send(ctx.new_with_feature_and_port(feature.clone(), REJECTED_PORT.clone())); + let mut rejected_feature = feature.clone(); + rejected_feature.attributes.insert( + Attribute::new("rejection_reason"), + AttributeValue::String("Failed to compute bounding rectangle".to_string()), + ); + fw.send(ctx.new_with_feature_and_port(rejected_feature, REJECTED_PORT.clone()));
91-97: Unnecessary clone of meshcode.The meshcode is cloned but only used once to create a string, which could be done without cloning.
- let binded_geometry = if let Some(binded_geometry) = - self.bind_geometry_into_mesh_2d(geometry, meshcode.clone()) - { - binded_geometry - } else { - continue; - }; + let binded_geometry = if let Some(binded_geometry) = + self.bind_geometry_into_mesh_2d(geometry, &meshcode) + { + binded_geometry + } else { + continue; + };This would require updating the method signature to take a reference:
- fn bind_geometry_into_mesh_2d(&self, geometry: &Geometry2D, mesh: JPMeshCode) -> Option<Geometry2D> { + fn bind_geometry_into_mesh_2d(&self, geometry: &Geometry2D, mesh: &JPMeshCode) -> Option<Geometry2D> {
88-89: Support for multiple mesh sizes could be added.Currently, only the 1km mesh is supported, but the PR description mentions potential for other mesh sizes (80km, 10km, 500m, 250m, 100m). Consider adding a parameter to configure the mesh size.
This would enhance the reusability of the processor for different use cases. You could add a parameter to the processor factory and modify the code to use the selected mesh type.
99-103: Consider adding more mesh metadata as attributes.Currently, only the mesh code is added as an attribute. It could be useful to add more information about the mesh, such as its bounds or type.
attributes.insert( Attribute::new("meshcode"), AttributeValue::String(meshcode.to_number().to_string()), ); + attributes.insert( + Attribute::new("mesh_type"), + AttributeValue::String("1km".to_string()), + ); + let mesh_bounds = meshcode.bounds(); + attributes.insert( + Attribute::new("mesh_min_x"), + AttributeValue::Number(mesh_bounds.min().x as f64), + ); + attributes.insert( + Attribute::new("mesh_min_y"), + AttributeValue::Number(mesh_bounds.min().y as f64), + ); + attributes.insert( + Attribute::new("mesh_max_x"), + AttributeValue::Number(mesh_bounds.max().x as f64), + ); + attributes.insert( + Attribute::new("mesh_max_y"), + AttributeValue::Number(mesh_bounds.max().y as f64), + );
147-205: Consider using a Strategy pattern for geometry processing.The match statement for handling different geometry types is quite long and complex. Consider refactoring to use a Strategy pattern or trait objects to handle different geometry types, which would make the code more modular and easier to maintain.
This would involve creating a trait for geometry binding strategies and implementing it for each geometry type. This would make the code more maintainable, especially if more geometry types are added in the future.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
engine/docs/mdbook/src/action.mdis excluded by!**/*.md
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
engine/runtime/action-processor/src/geometry/jp_standard_grid_accumulator.rs(1 hunks)engine/schema/actions.json(1 hunks)engine/schema/actions_en.json(1 hunks)engine/schema/actions_es.json(1 hunks)engine/schema/actions_fr.json(1 hunks)engine/schema/actions_ja.json(1 hunks)engine/schema/actions_zh.json(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: ci-api / ci-api-test
🔇 Additional comments (2)
engine/schema/actions_es.json (1)
2742-2758: Clean schema definition for the new processor.The schema entry for the JPStandardGridAccumulator is well-defined with appropriate ports and categorization. This follows the same pattern as other geometry processors in the schema.
engine/runtime/action-processor/src/geometry/jp_standard_grid_accumulator.rs (1)
22-59: Factory implementation looks good.The JPStandardGridAccumulatorFactory implementation follows the standard pattern for processor factories, with all required trait methods properly implemented.
engine/runtime/action-processor/src/geometry/jp_standard_grid_accumulator.rs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
engine/runtime/action-processor/src/geometry/jp_standard_grid_accumulator.rs (4)
35-37: Consider adding parameter schema support for configurable mesh sizes.The PR description mentions potential support for other mesh grid sizes (80km, 10km, 500m, 250m, 100m). Adding parameter schema support would allow users to configure the mesh size without code changes.
- fn parameter_schema(&self) -> Option<schemars::schema::RootSchema> { - None - } + fn parameter_schema(&self) -> Option<schemars::schema::RootSchema> { + use schemars::schema::{InstanceType, Schema, SchemaObject}; + use schemars::{gen::SchemaGenerator, JsonSchema}; + + let mut schema_obj = SchemaObject::default(); + schema_obj.metadata = Some(Box::new(schemars::schema::Metadata { + title: Some("JP Standard Grid Parameters".to_string()), + description: Some("Parameters for JP Standard Grid Accumulator".to_string()), + ..Default::default() + })); + + let mut obj = SchemaObject::default(); + obj.properties.insert( + "mesh_type".to_string(), + Schema::Object(SchemaObject { + instance_type: Some(InstanceType::String.into()), + enum_values: Some(vec![ + "80km".into(), + "10km".into(), + "1km".into(), + "500m".into(), + "250m".into(), + "100m".into(), + ]), + metadata: Some(Box::new(schemars::schema::Metadata { + description: Some("Mesh grid size to use".to_string()), + default: Some(serde_json::json!("1km")), + ..Default::default() + })), + ..Default::default() + }), + ); + + schema_obj.properties = obj.properties; + + Some(schemars::schema::RootSchema { + schema: schema_obj, + ..Default::default() + }) + }
89-89: Hardcoded mesh type limits extensibility.The mesh type is hardcoded to
JPMeshType::Mesh1km, which doesn't allow for the configurability mentioned in the PR description without code changes.Consider modifying the
JPStandardGridAccumulatorto accept a configurable mesh type parameter, which would work with the parameter schema suggestion above:- pub struct JPStandardGridAccumulator; + pub struct JPStandardGridAccumulator { + mesh_type: JPMeshType, + } // In the build method (line 51-59): - Ok(Box::new(JPStandardGridAccumulator)) + let mesh_type = if let Some(with) = _with { + if let Some(mesh_type_value) = with.get("mesh_type") { + if let Some(mesh_type_str) = mesh_type_value.as_str() { + match mesh_type_str { + "80km" => JPMeshType::Mesh80km, + "10km" => JPMeshType::Mesh10km, + "500m" => JPMeshType::Mesh500m, + "250m" => JPMeshType::Mesh250m, + "100m" => JPMeshType::Mesh100m, + _ => JPMeshType::Mesh1km, + } + } else { + JPMeshType::Mesh1km + } + } else { + JPMeshType::Mesh1km + } + } else { + JPMeshType::Mesh1km + }; + + Ok(Box::new(JPStandardGridAccumulator { mesh_type })) // Then in line 89: - let meshes_1km = JPMeshCode::from_inside_bounds(bounds, JPMeshType::Mesh1km); + let meshes = JPMeshCode::from_inside_bounds(bounds, self.mesh_type);
148-209: Refactor geometry type handling to reduce code duplication.The handling of LineString/MultiLineString and Polygon/MultiPolygon follows similar patterns with duplicated code.
Consider refactoring the geometry type handling to reduce duplication:
fn bind_geometry_into_mesh_2d( &self, geometry: &Geometry2D, mesh: JPMeshCode, ) -> Option<Geometry2D> { let bounds = mesh.bounds(); let bounds_polygon = Polygon2D::new( LineString2D::new(vec![ Coordinate2D::new_(bounds.min().x, bounds.min().y), Coordinate2D::new_(bounds.max().x, bounds.min().y), Coordinate2D::new_(bounds.max().x, bounds.max().y), Coordinate2D::new_(bounds.min().x, bounds.max().y), Coordinate2D::new_(bounds.min().x, bounds.min().y), ]), vec![], ); let bind_geometry = match geometry { Geometry::Point(point) => { let coords = point.0; if bounds.contains(&coords) { geometry.clone() } else { return None; } } + Geometry::LineString(line_string) | Geometry::MultiLineString(multi_line_string) => { + // Convert to MultiLineString if needed + let multi = match geometry { + Geometry::LineString(ls) => reearth_flow_geometry::types::multi_line_string::MultiLineString2D::new(vec![ls.clone()]), + Geometry::MultiLineString(mls) => mls.clone(), + _ => unreachable!(), + }; + + let clipped = bounds_polygon.clip(&multi, false); + + if clipped.0.is_empty() { + return None; + } else if clipped.0.len() == 1 { + Geometry::LineString(clipped.0[0].clone()) + } else { + Geometry::MultiLineString(clipped) + } + } + Geometry::Polygon(polygon) | Geometry::MultiPolygon(multi_polygon) => { + let intersection = match geometry { + Geometry::Polygon(poly) => poly.intersection(&bounds_polygon), + Geometry::MultiPolygon(mp) => mp.intersection(&MultiPolygon2D::new(vec![bounds_polygon])), + _ => unreachable!(), + }; + + if intersection.0.is_empty() { + return None; + } else if intersection.0.len() == 1 { + Geometry::Polygon(intersection.0[0].clone()) + } else { + Geometry::MultiPolygon(intersection) + } + } - Geometry::LineString(line_string) => { - let multi_line_string = - reearth_flow_geometry::types::multi_line_string::MultiLineString2D::new(vec![ - line_string.clone(), - ]); - - let clipped = bounds_polygon.clip(&multi_line_string, false); - - if clipped.0.is_empty() { - return None; - } else if clipped.0.len() == 1 { - Geometry::LineString(clipped.0[0].clone()) - } else { - Geometry::MultiLineString(clipped) - } - } - Geometry::MultiLineString(multi_line_string) => { - let clipped = bounds_polygon.clip(multi_line_string, false); - - if clipped.0.is_empty() { - return None; - } else if clipped.0.len() == 1 { - Geometry::LineString(clipped.0[0].clone()) - } else { - Geometry::MultiLineString(clipped) - } - } - Geometry::Polygon(polygon) => { - let intersection = polygon.intersection(&bounds_polygon); - - if intersection.0.is_empty() { - return None; - } else if intersection.0.len() == 1 { - Geometry::Polygon(intersection.0[0].clone()) - } else { - Geometry::MultiPolygon(intersection) - } - } - Geometry::MultiPolygon(multi_polygon) => { - let intersection = - multi_polygon.intersection(&MultiPolygon2D::new(vec![bounds_polygon])); - if intersection.0.is_empty() { - return None; - } else if intersection.0.len() == 1 { - Geometry::Polygon(intersection.0[0].clone()) - } else { - Geometry::MultiPolygon(intersection) - } - } _ => { return None; } }; Some(bind_geometry) }
137-146: Consider extracting bounds polygon creation into a helper method.This polygon creation code could be reused elsewhere.
impl JPStandardGridAccumulator { + fn create_bounds_polygon(&self, bounds: &reearth_flow_geometry::types::rect::Rect2D) -> Polygon2D { + Polygon2D::new( + LineString2D::new(vec![ + Coordinate2D::new_(bounds.min().x, bounds.min().y), + Coordinate2D::new_(bounds.max().x, bounds.min().y), + Coordinate2D::new_(bounds.max().x, bounds.max().y), + Coordinate2D::new_(bounds.min().x, bounds.max().y), + Coordinate2D::new_(bounds.min().x, bounds.min().y), + ]), + vec![], + ) + } fn bind_geometry_into_mesh_2d( &self, geometry: &Geometry2D, mesh: JPMeshCode, ) -> Option<Geometry2D> { let bounds = mesh.bounds(); - let bounds_polygon = Polygon2D::new( - LineString2D::new(vec![ - Coordinate2D::new_(bounds.min().x, bounds.min().y), - Coordinate2D::new_(bounds.max().x, bounds.min().y), - Coordinate2D::new_(bounds.max().x, bounds.max().y), - Coordinate2D::new_(bounds.min().x, bounds.max().y), - Coordinate2D::new_(bounds.min().x, bounds.min().y), - ]), - vec![], - ); + let bounds_polygon = self.create_bounds_polygon(&bounds);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
engine/runtime/action-processor/src/geometry/jp_standard_grid_accumulator.rs(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: ci-api / ci-api-test
🔇 Additional comments (3)
engine/runtime/action-processor/src/geometry/jp_standard_grid_accumulator.rs (3)
149-156: Point handling looks good.The point handling correctly checks if the point is within the mesh bounds, addressing a previous review comment.
1-22: Well-organized imports.The imports are comprehensive and appropriate for the task at hand, including all necessary components for geometry operations, runtime framework integration, and JP mesh code handling.
65-127: Processor implementation is robust.The
processmethod handles different geometry types appropriately, with good error handling and rejection of invalid geometries. The implementation follows the expected patterns and interfaces properly.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1047 +/- ##
=====================================
Coverage 7.51% 7.51%
=====================================
Files 177 177
Lines 31157 31157
=====================================
Hits 2342 2342
Misses 28614 28614
Partials 201 201
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Overview
JPStandardGridAccumulatoras a new actionjpmesh.rswhich provides features to handle Japanese standard mesh gridHow I tested
Screenshot
Memo
1kmmesh grid now, but is ready to support80km,10km,500m,250m,100mmesh grids with few changes.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes