Enable prefer type-only imports #4383
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
This pull request is automatically built and testable in CodeSandbox. To see build info of the built libraries, click here or the icon next to each commit SHA. Latest deployment of this branch, based on commit fc00cae:
|
✅ Deploy Preview for redux-docs ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
|
@markerikson - I forgot about this PR. Should be good to merge now |
timdorr
approved these changes
Sep 20, 2023
|
thanks! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR really doesn't fit under any of the categories available. Sorry if this kind of PR is not accepted, I will close if it's not.
This PR enables prefer type-only imports eslint rule. I noticed that
redux-toolkithas this rule enabled so I thought it'd be good to port it overreduxas well.Related to issue: #4382