-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 154
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Double sided placement #224
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Up until when I did my last order, there was a significant bump in cost for doing double-sided assembly, as opposed to single top-side only. That was the original reason for me to put all components on the top and just the battery clip on the back, which can be soldered by hand relatively easily. For most people, who I imagine order O(10) boards, I believe it is (or used to be at least) significantly cheapear to do top only and then fix the batt clip by hand. Do you know if that's still the case? |
I just looked. Yes, it about doubles the price with 5 units ($78.34 vs $144.57). There is $50 setup free with standard PCBA over economic that is the bulk of the difference with feeder loading fees being most of the remaining. Would having both files and updating the How to order doc highlight the differences be a good compromise? I'm terrible at soldering (software person) and I've had people email me asking for double-sided placement file. |
Yes I think that is a fair compromise. Better yet would be a process that doesn't require manual editing of the csvs that are exported from kicad. If kicad can automatically generate both top and bottom separately (which I think it does) we can do that and instruct power users to merge them in the wiki. I believe I used the now popular "JLCPCB fabrication toolkit" to generate the fabrication files. |
I've pushed some additional changes. I've also made some changes to the wiki, but I don't have the ability to push branches due to how GitHub Wiki works. How would you like the changes contributed? I have can provide a diff. |
I'm looking at the "JLCPCB fabrication toolkit". |
Thanks @ryanrolds. It looks good to me. My only nit would be to rename the files to "....top-side.csv" and "....double-side.csv" so it's more self documenting. For the wiki, I'm don't know how to grant write access, but please paste your diff here and I will edit it myself. |
Completely understand the desired for clairty. Please take a look at this diff. If you still want the names changed, I will update the PR and provide an updated diff.
|
Thanks. I still would like to be more explicit. Economic/standard are loaded terms in fabrication (it could be related to finishing, tolerances etc). Top-only and double-sided are less ambiguous. |
Will do. I should have some time on Wednesday. |
Here are the most recent (December) BoM and placement CSVs. I've used these CSV for at least 2 orders with JLCPCB. There is a new file for "standard" PCBA type and I've updated the file names to ensure clarity.