Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix unknown pools sheet and merge functionality with unknown components sheet #768

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 30, 2024

Conversation

micbakos-rdx
Copy link
Contributor

Description

This PR aims to consolidate the usage of the sheet showing addresses that the processor cannot resolve to something. In general transactions they are component addresses that are not associated with a dApp and in Pool redemption/contribution they are just pool addresses.

How to test

  1. Do a Pool redemption/contribution though sandbox. The "X pool components" must be clickable and must open a sheet with the list of pools.
  2. Do a gumball-club transaction. This should show in Using DApps section the dApp used in this transaction

PR submission checklist

  • I have tested account to account transfer flow and have confirmed that it works

Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Jan 29, 2024

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions

4.7% Coverage on New Code (required ≥ 40%)

See analysis details on SonarCloud

Copy link
Contributor

@raf-rdx raf-rdx left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Works as expected 👍

Copy link
Contributor

@giannis-rdx giannis-rdx left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

tested and it works 💯

@micbakos-rdx micbakos-rdx merged commit 6db5c37 into main Jan 30, 2024
8 of 9 checks passed
@micbakos-rdx micbakos-rdx deleted the bugfix/ABW-2846-unknown-pools branch January 30, 2024 09:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants